• On CBS.com: Sexy women of CBS
September 5, 2008 9:24 AM PDT

About time: Joost to launch browser-based player

Posted by Greg Sandoval
  • Print

Joost isn't letting the public try out the site yet but that will change soon.

(Credit: Joost)

Finally, Joost is going to correct the error that badly hobbled the Web video service many once considered to be a serious YouTube competitor.

Currently available for Windows and Mac, Joost is planning to launch a test version of its new site later this month that will feature a browser-based plug-in and will no longer require users to watch via the company's much maligned desktop client. In a not so surprising move, users will be able to embed Joost's videos.

CEO Mike Volpi acknowledged in an interview with CNET that the desktop client was one of the company's missteps but that the new browser-based player would provide ease of use, a high-quality video experience, and more content. The new site, according to Volpi, will even be less taxing on laptop batteries. News of Joost's new site was first reported by The Industry Standard.

But the big question that Joost must answer is whether the site overhaul comes too late to catch to Hulu or Google's YouTube.

Joost pounced onto the online-video scene with seemingly the right combination of founders, investors, and technology. The media instantly christened it a legitimate YouTube killer.

The start-up was the brainchild of Janus Friis and Niklas Zennström, the founders of Skype and Kazaa. Among the backers were media conglomerates Viacom and CBS, parent company of CNET, publisher of News.com. Joost was powered by the same peer-to-peer technology that turned Skype and Kazaa into the most disruptive forces in the telephone and music sectors, respectively.

The public wasn't impressed. The content offering was thin. The player often stalled or stuttered, and it relied on the desktop client--meaning that you couldn't just log on to the Web from any computer to access your Joost account.

Volpi came on a year ago, and not much changed until January, when the company's CTO left and Volpi initiated a house cleaning. Volpi says it's still too early in the game to crown any site a winner.

"There is still ample opportunity to create a portal or aggregation site," Volpi said in an interview last week. "People will go where they can find the content they want."

Yes, but are Web video fans already used to getting what they want at Hulu, the company created by NBC Universal and News Corp? The competitor launched last spring to glowing press reviews, and traffic has continued to mushroom. A report issued this week by LiveRail reported that Hulu is probably already generating as much revenue as YouTube, which launched in 2005.

When it comes to YouTube, the Google property is still far and away the Internet's most popular video site. More than a third of every video viewed online is at YouTube. But YouTube is a user-generated site, with most of its content 10 minutes or shorter. Joost is much more like Hulu, a distribution platform for mostly professionally made content.

Volpi said Joost has greatly enhanced the content selection. The site will feature shows from Warner Bros., CBS, and Comedy Central, as well as other Viacom properties. Volpi said Joost will eventually offer a greater selection than Hulu. Volpi said Hulu offered little outside of the shows from NBC and Fox.

He called the selection "tired."

Joost's videos will follow a five-second advertisement or "preroll." Despite enabling users to embed video, the site will not concentrate on syndicating content.

"Our plan is to be a destination site where people go to watch their favorite shows," Volpi said.

Greg Sandoval covers media and digital entertainment for CNET News. He is a former reporter for The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times. E-mail Greg.
Recent posts from Digital Media
Conde Nast to shutter teen site Flip.com
EFF, Bush administration spar over telecom immunity
Dr Pepper crashes Guns N' Roses' album party
Yahoo stock rises on new acquisition report
EFF to court: Don't shield telecoms from illegal-spying suits
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 7 comments
by J. Blow September 5, 2008 10:01 AM PDT
Their client wasn't the problem. The problem is that their content isn't unique or interesting or timely. If their content was any of those things people would use the service regardless of whether or not they required a download.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis September 13, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
Hey, I've used Joost, and the content on it is pretty good. I also didn't mind the download, and wish that Hulu would make a downloadable player so that I don't have to use my browser to watch videos on Hulu.
by rucknrun September 5, 2008 10:01 AM PDT
I liked the way Joost worked. They had zero content I wanted to watch. Content is everything.
Reply to this comment
by GotAMD September 5, 2008 10:24 AM PDT
Does the new site also feature content worth watching? Once I finished all of the (severely dated) 5th Gear episodes, I was done with Joost. I watched some other stuff, but they just don't have that much that interests me. Hulu is MUCH better content-wise.
Reply to this comment
by 0zSpit September 5, 2008 2:19 PM PDT
i tried joost about a year ago and it seemed like it had potential. then it quit working, it wouldn't install on several computers. it had a good design with better graphics than most other programs. i found a lot of the shows interesting because i never heard of them before. i'm not a television watcher. the one minute commercial was o.k., but they could have rotated it with something else. the same coke commercial over and over was a little annoying. they should have developed it into something, it seems like it was almost there and they gave up...
Reply to this comment
by Richardky September 5, 2008 3:04 PM PDT
The online version will flop if no change in content as everyone has all ready mentioned the download version was a nice program but nothing worth watching in fact the way it turned out it was nothing more than a video player with old outdated videos they choose for you !! very far fetched from the hype promo of online tv .. live content would be the way to go to rise above any competitor .. which some are already on there way of doing even myspace shows live concerts and other things ..
Reply to this comment
by unknown unknown September 6, 2008 2:05 AM PDT
Four words. Too little, too late. They content, fresh content on consistent basis to keep people interested.
Without it, how they deliver means little cause people will go else where. I agree Hulu is doing a much better job.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

A tech veteran responds to the recession

LogLogic's Patricia Sueltz heard a clear message about the economy from investors, but she already knows a thing or two about navigating through tough times.


Obama's AG pick on privacy

Eric Holder has criticized the warrantless wiretapping program, but his views on other online policies may not be that far from those of the Bush administration.


About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right