• On CBS.com: Sexy women of CBS
September 5, 2008 4:00 AM PDT

Was EarthLink's failed citywide Wi-Fi a blessing in disguise?

Posted by Marguerite Reardon
  • Print

The implosion of EarthLink's citywide Wi-Fi business may have been the best thing that ever happened to Wireless Philadelphia, the nonprofit charged with helping Philadelphia bridge the digital divide.

Independence Hall, Philadelphia

(Credit: Marguerite Reardon/CNET Networks)

Now under new management, the citywide Wi-Fi network that was originally funded and built by EarthLink will have a new business model, better coverage, and a new contract that should make it easier for Wireless Philadelphia to meet its primary goal of getting low-income families online.

"The new network owners are supposed to have a much more sustainable business model," said Karen Perry, director of the Connected Communities team for the Knight Center of Digital Excellence. "The fact that they are also focused on wired and wireless access will also improve the quality of the network, which could be very important for providing the nonprofit a more vibrant set of options."

Philadelphia had big plans to bring broadband and the Internet to the masses when it announced in 2005 that it was building the nation's largest Wi-Fi network spanning some 135 square miles. Wireless Philadelphia, a city-sponsored nonprofit, was created to provide the city's poor with an entire package of services to get them online. This package includes not only low-cost broadband access, but computers, training, technical support, and new applications.

While EarthLink provided a good portion of the initial funding for Wireless Philadelphia to get off the ground, the restrictive exclusive contract in some ways hamstrung the nonprofit's efforts and tied its success to the success of the network and the technology.

When EarthLink decided earlier this year that it was exiting the citywide Wi-Fi business, it looked like Wireless Philadelphia was doomed. But days before the network was to be shut down in June, a group of local investors swooped in and took over the network, promising a new business model and a revitalized plan.

Network Acquisition Company, which acquired the network, hasn't talked publicly about the details of its new plan, but it has hinted that its strategy will differ from EarthLink's. For one, it will use wired infrastructure to provide backhaul capacity to the Wi-Fi network. This should help improve coverage and capacity issues. NAC also plans to sign up more business customers and city agencies as anchor tenants of the network, guaranteeing bigger chunks of revenue to keep the network up and running.

These improvements, along with a new non-exclusive contract, could liberate the nonprofit and help it expand its reach and effectiveness in the community. And if Wireless Philadelphia can show successful outcomes for individuals and the city as a whole, it could serve as a model for policy makers looking to form a national broadband policy.

Defining the digital divide

There's been a lot of chatter over the years about the digital divide or the idea that there is a great chasm between people who have access to technology such as computers and the Internet, and those who do not. While some 68 percent of the U.S. population has access to the Internet via broadband or dial-up connections, there are still millions of people across the country who do not have any access at all.

Overwhelmingly, these unconnected individuals tend to be minorities and people with low education levels. A recent study by the Pew Internet & American Life Project found that only 57 percent of African Americans and 37 percent of Hispanics have Internet access. And only 29 percent of people who have not graduated from high school are connected to the Internet.

It's difficult to gauge what the impact of this exclusion means. In the past, Internet access was viewed as an unnecessary luxury, a tool used to send e-mail and casually surf Web sites. But increasingly, the Internet has become an important tool for getting information about and access to just about everything from health care to social services. It's used as a tool to engage parents in their children's education. And as newspapers shed their classified listings, it's become an important tool for looking for jobs.

"Digital inclusion has traditionally been seen as a charity initiative," The Knight Foundation's Perry said. "But that is rapidly changing. Increasingly, cities of all types--urban, suburban, and rural--are linking universal digital access to economic development imperatives."

From the beginning, Wireless Philadelphia's goal has been to provide broadband service to families who have never owned a computer and have little or no online experience. The group believes that getting these families online will increase their access to educational, employment, and life opportunities.

But it will also have big benefits for the city, such as reducing crime and unemployment, improving public health and social service efficiency, and increasing educational excellence.

"It's nearly impossible to apply for an entry-level job today without having basic digital skills and Internet access," Greg Goldman, CEO of Wireless Philadelphia said. "And there have been studies that show patients who access information online about HIV AIDS, hypertension, or diabetes have better health outcomes."

Partnering for results

Wireless Philadelphia has developed a somewhat unique approach to solving this complicated problem. For example, the group provides an entire package of services, which includes free or subsidized Internet access, a new or refurbished computer and modem, training, and technical support through nonprofit partners, which focus on specific needs, such as maternal health, job placement, or education.

"It's not just about simply providing cheap access to broadband," Goldman said. "It's about delivering a total package and finding a suitable way to deliver that package. You can offer $15 a month DSL, but without the programs that provide a way for people to get the hardware, the training, and the technical support it won't be successful."

A key part of Wireless Philadelphia's approach is its partnerships with other nonprofits. For example, Wireless Philadelphia offers its package to participants of a statewide welfare-to-work program. In exchange for completing the necessary requirements for the program, each individual receives a "digital inclusion package."

The package becomes an enticing incentive for welfare-to-work clients to complete their training, and it provides a long-lasting tool that clients can use long after the training program ends. Working with partners also means Wireless Philadelphia doesn't have to deal with screening and qualifying clients for its program, reducing the cost and hassle of administering the program. It also integrates the broadband bundle with a specific need. And finally, it helps provide the necessary funding for the project to continue. Currently, Wireless Philadelphia has 30 funding sources and more than 30 community partners.

While Wireless Philadelphia's ambitions have always been big, under the old deal with EarthLink, the nonprofit was tied to the partially built, and often unreliable, Wi-Fi network. From the earliest stages of deployment, EarthLink Wi-Fi users complained of poor signal quality indoors.

Testing the Wi-Fi network in Philadelphia.

(Credit: Marguerite Reardon/CNET Networks)

Even outdoors, some parts of the network perform better than others. For example, on a recent visit to Philadelphia, I stood directly under an EarthLink access point and discovered I was only getting download speeds of 768 kilobits per second and uploads of 494 kbps when I ran a Speakeasy broadband test. EarthLink had advertised the service at 1.5 Mbps per second.

Of course, there are many possible explanations for why I was getting these much slower speeds. Maybe the network was congested because there were a lot of users in the area. Or perhaps there was an issue with the Wi-Fi mesh or the backhaul. Or maybe the test was flawed. Whatever the cause, performance was not optimal.

NAC, which now owns the EarthLink network, and Tropos, the company whose equipment has been used to build the network, declined to speak to me for this article. Instead, their spokespeople said the companies would talk more about the network later this month when details of the new business plan are ready.

So far, what is known about NAC's approach is that the company plans to finish building out the network, which is 80 percent complete, within the next 12 to 18 months. And it plans to use a hybrid Wi-Fi and wireline technology to improve coverage and capacity.

But more importantly for Wireless Philadelphia, the nonprofit will no longer have to rely on one network provider for broadband access. Starting this fall, Goldman said that the group will approach other network operators about working with them to offer their broadband access as part of the Digital Inclusion bundle in areas of the city where it makes sense. If providers, such as Comcast and Verizon Communications, are willing to work with Wireless Philadelphia, it could greatly improve the reach and effectiveness of the program.

"Reliable network access is key to our success," Goldman said. "If our clients can't reliably connect to the Internet and get consistent, speedy connections, they won't use the services.

Wireless Philadelphia is also supporting Google's petition to the Federal Communications Commission to open up unused wireless frequencies called "white spaces," which sit between digital TV channels, to help expand the availability of inexpensive broadband access.

"Wireless Philadelphia is dedicated to closing the digital divide and believes the movement to open white spaces can greatly assist this effort nationally," the group said in an e-mail urging its supporters to sign the petition. "Continued technological innovation in this area will help make critical communications tools more open and available for everyone."

But in the end, Wireless Philadelphia must prove that broadband access matters. As an initial step toward this, the group is working with the OMG Center for Collaborative Learning to conduct a "Rapid Assessment" of the impact of the Digital Inclusion program to date. Initial results should be available later this year.

If the results of this assessment, as well as future assessments, can show marked improvements for individuals and eventually entire communities, it could help fuel the movement for a national broadband policy.

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from Wireless
Nokia completes Symbian acquisition
Nokia upgrades mapping and messaging services
Nokia's mystery device? The Nokia N97
Palm revenue craters as Treos fall out of favor
Clearwire-Sprint Nextel unveils new brand
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 12 comments
by bluemist9999 September 5, 2008 6:02 AM PDT
I believe focusing on basic literacy, health care and job skills provides the poor with more concrete immediate help than providing Internet access.

So, why is there so much emphasis on bridging the "digital divide?" Those on the other side have far more pressing, immediate issues.

Even for Internet access, I think it's more cost effective to setup all public libraries to offer free Internet access. That relieves the poor of having to maintain and troubleshoot a PC (which is difficult for the non-technically inclined) and trying to understand the nuances of wireless Internet access.
Reply to this comment
by faceless128 September 5, 2008 6:39 AM PDT
i guess i haven't been to every public library ever, but since the 90's, every one that i've been to has free internet access.
Reply to this comment
by bluetrane2028 September 5, 2008 7:37 AM PDT
Yes, but it's kind of hard to look for pr0n on a library computer... they tend to frown upon that.
by scarface74 September 5, 2008 7:09 AM PDT
At least in the AT&T territory you can get high speed internet 768k/128k for less than $20/month without subscribing to voice. Wouldn't it be cheaper to subsidize internet access instead -- not that I agree with that either.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto September 5, 2008 7:28 AM PDT
FWIW, Earthlink can do one hell of a nice WiFi Internet (see also Sprint Broadband, which I used for five years).
Reply to this comment
by Maggie Reardon September 5, 2008 7:54 AM PDT
A couple of interesting points have been brought up in the comments to this story that I wanted to address. And I apologize for not addressing them in the story.

First, it is true that public libraries have Internet access, but funding for libraries is being cut throughout the country. For example, the District of Columbia Public Library (DCPL) is facing a $2 million budget cut this year down from a total budget of $9.4 million. To deal with these cuts the library system will likely significantly cut its hours to about 15 hours a week at the branches and 16 at the central library, with Friday service eliminated. So relying on libraries alone to provide poor people access to the Internet so that they can look for a job or interact with their kids teachers and schools or so that an elderly person can get more information about how to better manage his diabetes, just doesn't seem like a solution to me.

As for AT&T and Verizon providing low-cost DSL services, I think that's great. I applaud them for creating a low-cost solution to serve the needs of price sensitive customers. But as Greg Goldman said in my article, access is only part of the solution. The population in Philadelphia that qualifies for this program are people with little education. They've probably never used a computer before. So they need to be trained and supported. What's more, a low-income family may be able to afford a $15 a month DSL bill, but coming up with the $800 to $1000 to buy a computer is another story altogether. So they need help getting a computer.

In general I am a results-oriented person. And I'm very interested to see what impact the Wireless Philadelphia program or any universal broadband program makes on individuals and communities. So I will be following up on this when Wireless Philadelphia gets the results from its rapid assessment study. I'll also be looking at what other cities are doing. And I'll be looking for other studies that shed some light on how affective these programs are in terms of improving the lives of low-income families and communities. So if you know of any, please forward them to me.

I understand that people are skeptical about the need for broadband. And since I work for a Web only publication, naturally all my readers are computer and Internet literate. But there is a large group of people out there who do not have the education, resources or access to the Internet. And as our economy and daily communication moves online, these people should not be excluded. I think in many ways, broadband is becoming as essential as telephone service, electricity and running water. Sure people can survive without these things. But in the U.S. in the 21st century, why should they have to?
Reply to this comment
by marianmerritt September 5, 2008 9:19 AM PDT
Having free community based wifi isn't just a dream to help the urban poor bridge the digital divide. It's an effort than can bring people into public spaces to work; it can help small businesses get started; it can allow the elderly to pay bills and do research without having to leave their homes.

the article returns some hope to the discussion of city-based initiatives. I've been on a community panel for the city of LA's efforts, but honestly we never seem to meet. I know the city is in a watch and learn mode from efforts like this one in Philadelphia.

When I visit schools in low income communities I'm always struck by the percentage of children with computers in the home. They may have a borrowed or shared computer, or a hand me down from a relative, but the statistics in this article, claiming such low numbers of African Americans or Hispanics having web access, makes me wonder. I've yet to meet a child in a housing project or after school program who doesn't have access to the Internet sometime during their day. And these are the children who can bring their knowledge home and teach their parents, grandparents and caregivers.
Reply to this comment
by sandor_f September 5, 2008 10:51 AM PDT
As a Philadelphia resident, i have to say Earthlink and the whole municipal wireless system in Philadelphia has been a debacle. Personally, i think it was a last ditch attempt by former mayor John Street to make a name for himself in something other than federal investigations and FBI wiretapping of his office.

I agree that $15/month internet access isnt the end of the story, but i think the former mayoral administration proceeded down the municipal wifi path with ill-intentions. there are and have been a number of technology collaborative within the city that work to get older, unused computers into the hands of the less privileged, and such machines hardly run $100 let alone $800 to $1000 (Apple's brand new state of the art MacBook's are $999)

I would have much rather seen the city work with NGOs and non-profits that already exist than try to build a municipal wifi system stemming from a good-for-nothing mayor's bravado. (And yes, Street was also my city councilman in the 9th district prior to his 8 years in city hall, so i have a skewed view)
Reply to this comment
by chaser7016 September 5, 2008 9:03 PM PDT
I don't see any WiFi municipality ever working ... unfortunately!

Its best to leave it up to the commercial industry and to better upcoming tech, like LTE or Wimax. They have the capital and it's their business to keep the network strong. A city is not going to be able to put the resources a large company can!

Philly is great, but my experience in University City with Wireless PHiladelphia was not the best. My laptop would pick it up, but was never able to connect. When it did it ..would only for 30 seconds and then drop.
Reply to this comment
by spkrman6 September 6, 2008 9:23 AM PDT
I don't think providing free internet is something government should be pushing, they are hiding their true agenda. Government sponsored internet at taxpayer expense will no doubt be monitored, tracked, censored and otherwise controlled in both content and performance. You can get a cheap, decent quality used computer on EBay for under $200.00, go to McDonalds and get online. Libraries are still an option, even if not as convenient. Why don't they keep the library budget, and skip this foolish idea? If there was a sound reason to do this, someone would already be doing it. I would agree that the mayor is trying to become a hero by spending taxpayer money. Socialized internet, benefiting the chosen few at the expense of others.
Reply to this comment
by sandor_f September 8, 2008 9:12 AM PDT
just to be clear, it was the FORMER mayor - John Street.

our current mayor, Michael Nutter, is a social progressive with a background in finance, and made his city council career being the one fighting corruption and pay-to-play. he is a breath of fresh air.
by artistjoh September 7, 2008 2:24 AM PDT
Leaving it to commercial processes, as more than one commenter thinks is adequate is what has happened up til now and is the reason we have a digital divide in all developed nations.

As the parent of a schizophrenic young man my private struggle to firstly get him using a computer and then get him using the internet is an important part of his recovery. He is now using email which is now expanding his social network, and the habitualization of using a complex device helps him regain basic life skills. He has re-entered tertiary education and the computer is an important part of him being able to practice and study at home, not just while at school.

He is fortunate that he has a strong family support base helping him back to normal life. The majority of the seriously mentally ill lose their family support as they are institutionalized and if they were to ever benefit from Internet and computer usage as they recover they need for there to be community based initiatives enabling both computer usage and internet access.

It is both insensitive and arrogant for those with normal lives to consider a program like Philidelphia's as being valueless. That digital divide is looming as an increasingly large social issue that will have to be faced this century. I run a small business. I am all too well aware of how the majority of my income is internet dependent. Soon it will be hard to get any kind of work or access services including education (my sector) without home broadband access. It is not fair for those disadvantaged for any reason to be excluded from our mainstream economy but that is what is happening in the real world more and more.

Go Philadelphia! I hope you work the bugs out and show the rest of us how to do it.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

A tech veteran responds to the recession

LogLogic's Patricia Sueltz heard a clear message about the economy from investors, but she already knows a thing or two about navigating through tough times.


Obama's AG pick on privacy

Eric Holder has criticized the warrantless wiretapping program, but his views on other online policies may not be that far from those of the Bush administration.


About Wireless

Check out the latest wireless news on CNET News, featuring the latest news on cell phones, mobile gear, VOIP, and internet access via broadband and wireless connections.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Wireless topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right