• On MovieTome: See the TRAILER for TERMINATOR 4!
August 14, 2008 3:44 PM PDT

Massive solar photovoltaic plants are California-bound

Posted by Elsa Wenzel
  • Print

SAN FRANCISCO--Pacific Gas & Electric has inked deals with OptiSolar and SunPower to establish 800 megawatts of solar farms in California, which could become the world's largest set of grid-tied photovoltaic installations.

The new plants would provide 1.65 billion kilowatt hours each year, enough to serve nearly 250,000 homes, according to Jack Keenan, CEO and senior vice president of PG&E.

"This commitment not only moves us forward in meeting our renewable goal, it's also a significant step forward in the renewable energy sector," he said. "Utility-scale deployment of PV (photovoltaic) technology may well become cost competitive with other forms of renewable energy generation, such as solar thermal and wind."

The deals would bring the utility's renewable energy commitment to 24 percent of its portfolio. California demands that PG&E provide 20 percent of electricity from renewables by 2010. Solar power also provides the benefit of serving electricity during crucial peak-demand afternoon hours, potentially helping to reduce strain on the grid, Keenan added.

Click on the image to view a photo gallery of different utility-scale solar technologies.

(Credit: Schott)

OptiSolar's 550 megawatts are set to come online fully in 2013, and SunPower's 250 megawatts should be running by 2012, both in central San Luis Obispo County. Unlike these photovoltaic projects, most large-scale solar farms feature solar thermal systems.

The utility would rely on existing transmission lines rather than building them from scratch to deliver electricity to customers from the solar ranches in central California, according to PG&E.

OptiSolar's 550 megawatts would offset the greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to removing 90,000 cars from the road, according to the thin-film photovoltaic equipment maker. It filed in July for a conditional use permit to build near San Luis Obispo, and it aims to begin construction in 2010.

"The Topaz solar farm will grow clean electricity on previously disturbed, unused farmland with low-profile panels minimizing visual impact," said Randy Goldstein, CEO of OptiSolar. "It's designed to be compatible with key wildlife species and avoid environmentally sensitive areas."

OptiSolar is also building a factory in Sacramento, planning to offer 1,000 green-collar jobs. Four-hundred people work at its current factory in Hayward, Calif.

In May the company revealed plans to establish 550 solar megawatts 100 miles north of Los Angeles.

"We are now here, with technology available now, that will allow solar to take its place among central station power plants with wind, geothermal, gas, and coal," said Tom Werner, CEO of SunPower.

He said the company has installed 350 megawatts of solar equipment on 450 sites on three continents. That includes the first utility-scale photovoltaic plant in Bavaria, Germany, in 2004 and the largest U.S. solar installation, 14 megawatts at Nellis Air Force Base in Arizona. SunPower is also developing rooftop solar panels for major retailers including Wal-Mart, JC Penney, and Macy's.

"What you are seeing here is the foundation of an industry that can deliver electricity cleanly, cheaply, and reliably than the fossil fuel alternatives," said Adam Browning, executive of the Vote Solar Initiative.

"That's really good news because the Department of Energy predicts we will need 386 gigawatts by 2015 just to keep up with load growth...This is a very large, great leap forward in economies of scale. This is the wave of the future."

But Browning, along with representatives of PG&E, and the solar companies, warned that advancement in solar power will wither if Congress fails to extend renewable energy tax credits past their expiration at the end of 2008.

Recent posts from Green Tech
Ford accelerates electric-vehicle plans
Green news harvest: Utility installs solar panels
Obama's security adviser calls for energy action
Ta ta, Tesla
Eyes turn to auto start-ups' funding, aid requests
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 7 comments
by Manhattan2 August 15, 2008 8:35 AM PDT
Doesn't anyone get it. It seems to us that these companies like Wal-Mart, JC Penny, and Macy's are all trying to jump on the Al Gore and Google bandwagon to state their greenness by going solar. Nice try but all these installations are being done in error. We feel in every case there is a better return of renewable energy that can be captured for the same invested dollar with lower CO2 production cost to the environment. Yes that means they are wrong to go Solar in the way that they are. There is a better way it already exists.


[CNET editors' note: Sentence deleted for violating posting rule.]


The real question will have to be asked. Did they know this information ahead of time and still go solar for the sake of looking green? If that is the case, that will not be the way we help the planet. Who out there is more interested in helping the planet and less interested in making profits and looking green? Do the research, the answers are out there.


[CNET editors' note: Sentence deleted for violating posting rule.]


It may be crucial that we tackle the problems the right way! Copy and email this text to your Senator, Barack Obama and John McCain and yes even George Bush. They should all be made aware of what is going on. The planets health and your child's future may be at risk.
Reply to this comment
by DigitalFrog August 15, 2008 8:52 AM PDT
Wow. Obviously no arrogance or self-promotion going on with Manhattan2.
Reply to this comment
by Manhattan2 August 15, 2008 9:40 AM PDT
We are not selling anything! Trying to inform. Simply stating current facts. We could sell to millions but fixed base photovoltaic solutions is not the answer. If someone proves our numbers wrong we will go away. Our cause is logic, not greed, not blind emotion trying to look green. Just logic! We have built a better mouse trap but it is not for sale. Others will have to participate. State and Federal governments will have to come to their senses. As engineers we are not interested in the politics involved in completely abandoning the million solar roofs logic but that is what needs to happen. We simply analyze and design better solutions.

Not trying to kill solar. Trying to shape solar so it is something the masses can participate in. The web guys and oil companies that started a lot of these solar companies need to spend their money wisely. They should be smart enough to understand their errors, but if those errors are/were intentional that is a different story.
Reply to this comment
by baisa August 15, 2008 1:58 PM PDT
Manhattan2 is a bogus entity. What legitimate company has Google ads on its front page? Its "products" don't even include anything related to solar. It harps about solar stuff on its front page but there isn't a single visible link to back this up.
Reply to this comment
by Manhattan2 August 15, 2008 8:18 PM PDT
No products for sale. Just tracking how successful we are at getting the word out. Phase 1 of a 5 phase program is all that has been released and phase 1 is to inform. To force those that are seeking solar solutions to investigate their options. Phase 1 can already improve CO2 reduction by 40% with no added cost. Those that argue or try to block our words are usually installers and manufacturers trying to make profits off of installing inefficient, greater CO2 producing solutions. We are seeking like minded creative engineers to join the Manhattan 2 Project. Solar panels to batteries does not make sense. Expensive fixed solar panels does not make sense. This may be because our solutions solve these hurdles and those products will be released in due time. If going house to house and business to business is the game that will continue to be played we can dominate that space with the products and programs we already have planned. That is not our goal but that would be the easy way out. Either way we suggest photovoltaic installers seek other avenues of revenue. We have only hinted at what we have to prepare those that want to be a part of our work to find us. This is big and phase 1 is taking shape and the word is getting out there. Again we are new to distributing our findings without giving away our product design. That is why you will only get snippets and hints of our plans.. If you seek the highest return for your solar investment email us at solartransfer@aol.com . We are funding our projects privately. We will partner with only companies and individuals that use open dialogue and common sense to tackle the issues that are facing us all. The Manhattan 2 Project, this time for all the right reasons!
Reply to this comment
by provospain August 16, 2008 2:21 AM PDT
So your big idea - Manhattan2 - is to relocate or redirect private buyer's solar panels to where the most sun falls on them and have them get a return on what it produces? I guess that make some sense on a residential level, but then you should be one of the biggest supporters of a large utility grade install like this one or solar thermal that is efficient, properly located (have you been to central CA? Sunny...) and eliminates the proposed inefficiency of individual installs. It does make it appear that you're just trying to generate hits for yourself or your "partner" (customers), in which case please spare us.
Reply to this comment
by Aspire2Renew August 16, 2008 9:00 AM PDT
I'll say this much, I'm a firm supporter of alternative energy in it's many forms. I try and learn as much as possible through current news and the underlying science behind the products (I'm an aspiring engineer). With that being said, I also maintain a certain level of objectivity to current issues. I want to see a solution(s) that fits according to the logistics and demand. For this specific project, it makes sense!
Yes, the ideal solution would be for every residential home/small community to be self sufficient. There would be little loss in transmission, and consequently less draw on the existing grid itself. This is not viable though, because obviously we don't have that demand yet. The next best thing is having stationary, efficient panels, to provide in bulk....

For us people in the Great White North, your company sounds similar the already established Bullfrog
Note: I'm not trying to promote, just to compare. <http://www.bullfrogpower.com/>
Is there any difference?
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

A tech veteran responds to the recession

LogLogic's Patricia Sueltz heard a clear message about the economy from investors, but she already knows a thing or two about navigating through tough times.


Obama's AG pick on privacy

Eric Holder has criticized the warrantless wiretapping program, but his views on other online policies may not be that far from those of the Bush administration.


About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right