Analyst: Half of 'social media campaigns' will flop
Adam Sarner, an analyst with market research firm Gartner, has projected that over 75 percent of Fortune 1000 companies with Web sites will have undertaken some kind of online social-networking initiative for marketing or customer relations purposes. But, he added in an interview with CNET News, 50 percent of those campaigns will be classified as failures.
Sarner plans to present his results at the annual Gartner Symposium/ITxpo 2008, which takes place October 12-16 in Orlando, Fla.
"(Businesses) will rush to the community and try to connect, but essentially they won't have a mutual purpose, and they'll fail," Sarner said. By a "mutual purpose," he means a way to serve both the company putting out the campaign and the audience interacting with it: finding that balance is not easy. The quirkiest and most addictive campaigns often provide little value for the company and turn out to be fads, whereas marketing efforts on the Web often don't go over as well with the public.
He cited the Facebook craze as an example. The social network is "more for the community than it is for the bottom line," and it's tough for marketers to get their message in on a site that's focused on communicating with your friends rather than finding stuff to buy. One of its more business-savvy advertising options, Beacon, on the other hand, was "more about the business trying to get value than it is actually about the customer." Some Facebook users didn't like it, and a public backlash ensued.
Sarner's research deduced that by 2012, fully half of all purchases, whether online or offline, will have some Web-based component to them. That could mean searching for product reviews, reading about a new product on a blog, or comparing prices even if the purchase is ultimately made in a store.
There's obviously no universal solution to social-media advertising and marketing, because every company is different. But Sarner offered a preliminary tip: to make sure that there's a clear reason why such a campaign is instituted, and "get people talking" isn't enough. "Are you discovering what's going to be the new black next season?" he suggested as an example of a trendspotting-focused strategy.
Once you've answered that question, it's time to pick and choose: whether to use existing technologies or build them in-house, whether the focus should be video or discussion or Digg-like yes-no voting, ad nauseam.
The problem with one of the most visible failures in social-media marketing--the number of brands that rushed headlong into virtual world Second Life two years ago--was that nobody was asking or answering those questions, Sarner said. Companies simply built "virtual headquarters" in the hope that Second Life would gain mass appeal, and then it failed to budge from its status as a niche forum for subculture and futurism.
For some companies, a Second Life campaign would be a good idea if you were distinctly trying to target that segment of the population, Sarner explained, and could use the 3D technology to actually come up with something innovative. He cited the example of electric cars. "If Honda has a new car and it's going to be purely electric, you could've set a Second Life campaign up that's promotional in nature," he said. "The futurism angle of an electric car, it kind of fits the people in that segment."
When asked whether the faltering economy will mean that businesses are cutting back on this largely unproven field of social media for marketing or customer relations, Sarner said he didn't think so, and that many businesses will turn to the Web to stay in touch with consumers during a difficult financial climate. "This is going to be a lifeline," he said. "You don't ruin your customers, and your spirit of customers is probably the only thing you have."
Caroline McCarthy, a CNET News staff writer, is a downtown Manhattanite happily addicted to social-media tools and restaurant blogs. Her pre-CNET resume includes interning at an IT security firm and brewing cappuccinos. E-mail Caroline.
- Topics:
-
Views
- Bookmark:
- Digg
- Del.icio.us



For some reason this is the hardest fact for some companies to wrap their heads around.
If you build it, they will come. :)
That is the marketing method of the 80's still seen here. "Half of social media campaigns will flop" or did you read the other "Analyst" recently: Why communities will fail?
Pattern No. 2: Win the reader by talking about effectiveness, ROI and profitability.
So social media is now about ROI and...
Pattern No.3: Visit my seminar, buy my research, take my service - but don't do anything right now.
Well, yes, if you are afraid of a conversation with your customer. Stop working, fire your employees, close your shop, discuss it with your lawyer and psychiatrist and then come back.
Well did it ever occurred to you that YOUR buying process is already fundamentally based on social media. YOU read blogs, forums and educate yourself in the "SOCIAL WEB". To be part of this is NO rocket science. You will make mistakes but your COMMUNITY will tell you - and they will tell you straight and clear what they expect from you. At the end all these warnings feel like "DO NOT TALK TO YOUR CUSTOMER - YOU MAY SAY SOMETHING WRONG".
Give me a break
Axel
If you build it, they will come. :)
Brian
http://www.konnects.com
http://twitter.com/TheDigitalDeep
Fortune 1000 companies will never fully embrace social media well (for the most part) because the average tenure of a chief marketing officer is 23 months ... just a touch longer than you need to wait to see some sustainable growth in a social media campaign.
I've written a social media strategy for a Fortune 100 company. They canned it after three months. THREE MONTHS. Why? Because the corresponding advertisements didn't test well with a sample group.
So long as traditional marketing measures and safeguards are used to gauge new media and marketing efforts, all you'll see is FAIL, FAIL, FAIL.
The problem with companies doing social media badly is they are not asking enough questions on the front end and not asking the right questions on the back end.
First and foremost do not try to be something your not. Its about sharing information and creating honest dialog between brand and consumer, and can take form in many different mediums that reside on your Social Media site.
Second developing a Social Media objective is not a short term solution and will require on going investment of time and money on the part of the Brand. That is not to say that there cannot be short term components that are specific to time frame. I hate to even mention contests as everyone seems to be running some sort of sweepstakes or "Make our Content For Us" scheme. By creating content that can demonstrate value, evoke customer engagement, or provide brand lift and awareness are really the fundamentals. Its not a un-managed marketing solution.
In most cases brands already do this with numerous advertising and marketing efforts now. Its really about PR that has latent effects that can relate back to sales, site visits, and brand equity.
Don't over complicate a very simple concept. I would argue how do we define success and failure when it comes to Social Media Marketing, and is it different than a bad TV, Radio Spot or print ad that sees little return? Short of a complete miss fire that would equate to decline in sales directly to bad PR, or grossly overspending on some half baked creative... how do you fail at Social Media?
However, that doesn't mean SL is a dead duck for business. There is a growing awareness that SL is useful for training, education, collaboration, product design, etc. Just beware of those wolves in sheeps clothing.
Engagement through the social web must become your new way of doing business and as integral a part of your company as telephones, computers and <gasp> people.
Engagement through the social web must become your new way of doing business and as integral a part of your company as telephones, computers and <gasp> people.
A campaign should be based on strategy--listening, setting goals, choosing tools and planning strategy to help you meet those goals, engaging and then evaluating that strategy.
How "successful" has traditional/conventional marketing been?. Over $600 billion is spent worldwide
on advertising alone, and over 90% of that spend has little if any ROI indications. I've often heard
of this phrase related to this spend: "pay and pray". Is traditional/conventional marketing "successful"? or is it just that we really don't know any better?.
To analysts: Don't throw out the tea while it is brewing. Help find better ways to brew it.