• On MovieTome: See the TRAILER for TERMINATOR 4!
October 6, 2008 8:00 AM PDT

Analyst: Half of 'social media campaigns' will flop

Posted by Caroline McCarthy
  • Print

Adam Sarner, an analyst with market research firm Gartner, has projected that over 75 percent of Fortune 1000 companies with Web sites will have undertaken some kind of online social-networking initiative for marketing or customer relations purposes. But, he added in an interview with CNET News, 50 percent of those campaigns will be classified as failures.

Sarner plans to present his results at the annual Gartner Symposium/ITxpo 2008, which takes place October 12-16 in Orlando, Fla.

"(Businesses) will rush to the community and try to connect, but essentially they won't have a mutual purpose, and they'll fail," Sarner said. By a "mutual purpose," he means a way to serve both the company putting out the campaign and the audience interacting with it: finding that balance is not easy. The quirkiest and most addictive campaigns often provide little value for the company and turn out to be fads, whereas marketing efforts on the Web often don't go over as well with the public.

He cited the Facebook craze as an example. The social network is "more for the community than it is for the bottom line," and it's tough for marketers to get their message in on a site that's focused on communicating with your friends rather than finding stuff to buy. One of its more business-savvy advertising options, Beacon, on the other hand, was "more about the business trying to get value than it is actually about the customer." Some Facebook users didn't like it, and a public backlash ensued.

Sarner's research deduced that by 2012, fully half of all purchases, whether online or offline, will have some Web-based component to them. That could mean searching for product reviews, reading about a new product on a blog, or comparing prices even if the purchase is ultimately made in a store.

There's obviously no universal solution to social-media advertising and marketing, because every company is different. But Sarner offered a preliminary tip: to make sure that there's a clear reason why such a campaign is instituted, and "get people talking" isn't enough. "Are you discovering what's going to be the new black next season?" he suggested as an example of a trendspotting-focused strategy.

Once you've answered that question, it's time to pick and choose: whether to use existing technologies or build them in-house, whether the focus should be video or discussion or Digg-like yes-no voting, ad nauseam.

The problem with one of the most visible failures in social-media marketing--the number of brands that rushed headlong into virtual world Second Life two years ago--was that nobody was asking or answering those questions, Sarner said. Companies simply built "virtual headquarters" in the hope that Second Life would gain mass appeal, and then it failed to budge from its status as a niche forum for subculture and futurism.

For some companies, a Second Life campaign would be a good idea if you were distinctly trying to target that segment of the population, Sarner explained, and could use the 3D technology to actually come up with something innovative. He cited the example of electric cars. "If Honda has a new car and it's going to be purely electric, you could've set a Second Life campaign up that's promotional in nature," he said. "The futurism angle of an electric car, it kind of fits the people in that segment."

When asked whether the faltering economy will mean that businesses are cutting back on this largely unproven field of social media for marketing or customer relations, Sarner said he didn't think so, and that many businesses will turn to the Web to stay in touch with consumers during a difficult financial climate. "This is going to be a lifeline," he said. "You don't ruin your customers, and your spirit of customers is probably the only thing you have."

Caroline McCarthy, a CNET News staff writer, is a downtown Manhattanite happily addicted to social-media tools and restaurant blogs. Her pre-CNET resume includes interning at an IT security firm and brewing cappuccinos. E-mail Caroline.
Recent posts from The Social
Facebook Marketplace relaunch powered by Oodle
Memo to OpenID: Keep it simple, please
Ning puts the handcuffs on porno networks
Digg CEO says company's not for sale
Gawker Media's rolling layoffs continue
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 17 comments
by lmclucas October 6, 2008 8:57 AM PDT
Social media will need to reinvent itself with a lot less "game" and a lot more productivity/efficiency if it wants a second life in the B2B and over-40 markets. (Think first person shooter instead of role play and leave the avatars as an option for those with the time and inclination to fiddle.) As a consumer, the ability to walk through a virtual store and see/compare/choose items from shelves or racks rather than having to filter through hundreds of narrative search results has appeal, but not if I have to do it with someone else's naked avatar pestering me the entire time. Ditto for business use. As a host, the ability to rent space on Second Life for a business meeting or presentation was very appealing and promised a user experience with far more interest and utility than the typical online meeting service, but getting there was way too complicated for the average invitee, some of whom are just now getting the hang of email. The potential is still there, it just needs to be appropriately exploited for a more mature market.
Reply to this comment
by jgiovannetti October 6, 2008 10:59 AM PDT
"The social network is 'more for the community than it is for the bottom line.'"

For some reason this is the hardest fact for some companies to wrap their heads around.
Reply to this comment
by davekerpen October 6, 2008 12:43 PM PDT
I agree. But with great community will come a great bottom line.
If you build it, they will come. :)
Reply to this comment
by AxelSchultze October 6, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
Pattern No.1: Fear, uncertainty and doubt
That is the marketing method of the 80's still seen here. "Half of social media campaigns will flop" or did you read the other "Analyst" recently: Why communities will fail?
Pattern No. 2: Win the reader by talking about effectiveness, ROI and profitability.
So social media is now about ROI and...
Pattern No.3: Visit my seminar, buy my research, take my service - but don't do anything right now.
Well, yes, if you are afraid of a conversation with your customer. Stop working, fire your employees, close your shop, discuss it with your lawyer and psychiatrist and then come back.

Well did it ever occurred to you that YOUR buying process is already fundamentally based on social media. YOU read blogs, forums and educate yourself in the "SOCIAL WEB". To be part of this is NO rocket science. You will make mistakes but your COMMUNITY will tell you - and they will tell you straight and clear what they expect from you. At the end all these warnings feel like "DO NOT TALK TO YOUR CUSTOMER - YOU MAY SAY SOMETHING WRONG".

Give me a break

Axel
Reply to this comment
by davekerpen October 6, 2008 1:03 PM PDT
I agree. But with great community will come a great bottom line.
If you build it, they will come. :)
Reply to this comment
by CaptainChunk October 6, 2008 5:26 PM PDT
It is a tough sell for sure. Companies are very concerned about ROI, but I think the benefits of having a community can be hard to see for some companies. Often times you have a built in beta testing group or dedicated customers that can help you make product choices. I do agree there is more to it than just ROI, but right now it is still hard to figure out what that other component is.

Brian
http://www.konnects.com
Reply to this comment
by DigitalNick October 6, 2008 6:13 PM PDT
A social media campaign will always be considered a failure if a Fortune 1000 company views it's success in traditional marketing/ROI terms. Social media is about conversation and engagement; rather than how much did I generate at the box office. I'm interested in seeing what those companies considered a failure and a success. That 50 percent stat is not surprising if most of them fail to realize that the campaign should focus on the relationships, not the revenues.

http://twitter.com/TheDigitalDeep
Reply to this comment
by JasonFalls October 7, 2008 6:20 AM PDT
I not only agree with Sarner's assertions, but have seen them first hand. But it's not only because companies will rush into things not knowing what it truly means or takes to be involved in social media, it's because they don't understand that community interaction, growth and measurable ROI take time. Social media (which is one part of the greater communications and marketing mix, not some savior thing that will turn your business around) is an investment in time and people - namely your customers - which means it will not turn your profits from Quarter 1 to Quarter 3 or 4. It's one part of a greater marketing strategy that, over time, makes your product or service more top of mind and meaningful to your audience.

Fortune 1000 companies will never fully embrace social media well (for the most part) because the average tenure of a chief marketing officer is 23 months ... just a touch longer than you need to wait to see some sustainable growth in a social media campaign.

I've written a social media strategy for a Fortune 100 company. They canned it after three months. THREE MONTHS. Why? Because the corresponding advertisements didn't test well with a sample group.

So long as traditional marketing measures and safeguards are used to gauge new media and marketing efforts, all you'll see is FAIL, FAIL, FAIL.

The problem with companies doing social media badly is they are not asking enough questions on the front end and not asking the right questions on the back end.
Reply to this comment
by ahoving October 7, 2008 8:11 AM PDT
it needs to be a brilliant, delightful collaboration among all parties
Reply to this comment
by deingalls October 7, 2008 8:50 AM PDT
Social Media as a marketing platform is still emerging. Few companies or agencies fully understand what its true purpose is. You get lots of people arguing about ROI as it directly relates to sales. Well that certainly can be a bi-product of utilizing Social Media, but it should not be the sole purpose. Its all about building Brand awareness through positive social communications. Its the same thing that goes on everyday with a dialog between sales people and clients . Its about creating a transparency between the brand and the viewing public. If a brand cannot produce content that demonstrates value and positive customer experience they are dealing with the wrong agency or listening to the wrong people.

First and foremost do not try to be something your not. Its about sharing information and creating honest dialog between brand and consumer, and can take form in many different mediums that reside on your Social Media site.

Second developing a Social Media objective is not a short term solution and will require on going investment of time and money on the part of the Brand. That is not to say that there cannot be short term components that are specific to time frame. I hate to even mention contests as everyone seems to be running some sort of sweepstakes or "Make our Content For Us" scheme. By creating content that can demonstrate value, evoke customer engagement, or provide brand lift and awareness are really the fundamentals. Its not a un-managed marketing solution.

In most cases brands already do this with numerous advertising and marketing efforts now. Its really about PR that has latent effects that can relate back to sales, site visits, and brand equity.

Don't over complicate a very simple concept. I would argue how do we define success and failure when it comes to Social Media Marketing, and is it different than a bad TV, Radio Spot or print ad that sees little return? Short of a complete miss fire that would equate to decline in sales directly to bad PR, or grossly overspending on some half baked creative... how do you fail at Social Media?
Reply to this comment
by Earl Benzar October 7, 2008 10:29 AM PDT
I have a different take regarding Second Life. The "failure" occurred because certain solution providers such as Electric Sheep were selling enterprises an untenable model, namely that Second Life was the next big thing for "marketing." The only ones who made money from this awful advice were the snake oil salespeople.

However, that doesn't mean SL is a dead duck for business. There is a growing awareness that SL is useful for training, education, collaboration, product design, etc. Just beware of those wolves in sheeps clothing.
Reply to this comment
by clearcast October 7, 2008 11:20 AM PDT
There is another key issue here that no one is addressing. If you think of social media as a "campaign," then your failure rate will be pushing up against 100%. Best to think of it as a strategy, just like how you brand whatever your product or service is. As others have pointed out, ROI is tough, if not impossible, to measure and SM requires a new way of thinking and implementation. It's not about buying ad pages, convention floor space or TV or radio. But what tends to happen with old line companies is that they approach SM through that prism.

Engagement through the social web must become your new way of doing business and as integral a part of your company as telephones, computers and <gasp> people.
Reply to this comment
by clearcast October 7, 2008 11:21 AM PDT
There is another key issue here that no one is addressing. If you think of social media as a "campaign," then your failure rate will be pushing up against 100%. Best to think of it as a strategy, just like how you brand whatever your product or service is. As others have pointed out, ROI is tough, if not impossible, to measure and SM requires a new way of thinking and implementation. It's not about buying ad pages, convention floor space or TV or radio. But what tends to happen with old line companies is that they approach SM through that prism.

Engagement through the social web must become your new way of doing business and as integral a part of your company as telephones, computers and <gasp> people.
Reply to this comment
by williams925 October 7, 2008 1:06 PM PDT
What Mr. Sarner points out is something people in advertising have always known ... strategy should drive marketing, not the medium.
Reply to this comment
by socialTNT October 7, 2008 2:41 PM PDT
The reason why many campaigns fail is because people get shiny thing syndrome. Instead of listening to what their audiences are saying and how/where they are saying it, many companies just dive in, choosing a technology off a check list instead of one that is a viable platform for reaching their audiences.

A campaign should be based on strategy--listening, setting goals, choosing tools and planning strategy to help you meet those goals, engaging and then evaluating that strategy.
Reply to this comment
by MichaelChin October 8, 2008 7:49 AM PDT
The first thing that needs to be done is that marketers need to stop thinking of this in terms of 'campaigns.' Social media is about relationships, whether personal or professional. Do you run campaigns with your friends and family? Why would you think a campaign in this context would work with customers?
Reply to this comment
by tej_arora October 9, 2008 4:05 AM PDT
Marketing is about reaching a large engaged audience. I don't believe there is any mechanism traditional marketers have, that can reach engaged audiences faster, cheaper, bigger and better than web communities. Any analysis that brands social media marketing as a "failure" is, first of all, premature. Secondly, a "failure" relative to what?.

How "successful" has traditional/conventional marketing been?. Over $600 billion is spent worldwide
on advertising alone, and over 90% of that spend has little if any ROI indications. I've often heard
of this phrase related to this spend: "pay and pray". Is traditional/conventional marketing "successful"? or is it just that we really don't know any better?.

To analysts: Don't throw out the tea while it is brewing. Help find better ways to brew it.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

A tech veteran responds to the recession

LogLogic's Patricia Sueltz heard a clear message about the economy from investors, but she already knows a thing or two about navigating through tough times.


Obama's AG pick on privacy

Eric Holder has criticized the warrantless wiretapping program, but his views on other online policies may not be that far from those of the Bush administration.


About The Social

CNET News' Caroline McCarthy is a downtown Manhattanite who believes that, despite popular opinion, the Web can actually help your social life. She's happily addicted to fun social-media tools from Twitter to Yelp to Facebook, sends an inordinate number of text messages, and has a tendency to waste time at the office reading restaurant blogs. Here, she explores all facets of the Web's gregarious side, as well as the unique tech culture in her home city of New York. (Don't call it Silicon Alley.)

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Social topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right