Canon wises up with 50D sensor and new zoom
My coworker Lori Grunin already covered Canon's announcement of its $1,400 mid-range EOS 50D SLR, but as somebody who's in the market for a new SLR, I thought I'd weigh in with some thoughts of my own. I'm glad Canon is investing where perhaps it counts most: the sensor. If the reviews look good, this will be the first time I've really been tempted to upgrade from my well-used Canon Rebel XT.

Canon's EOS 50D will ship in October for $1,399, not including a lens. Also shown here is the new EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS zoom lens.
(Credit: Canon)When it ships in October, the 50D will sport a 15.1 megapixel sensor, up from 10.1 megapixels in the current 40D. The increase in megapixels is nice for the poster-print and microstock-sales crowds, but what's most notable is the increase of the top ISO from 3,200 to 12,800.
That means Canon has done some serious work to cut down on the noise levels inside the sensor, which bodes well for image quality not just at the new extremes but also at more ordinary sensitivity settings. ISO 3,200, for example, is now part of the ordinary range, not the extended range that must be manually enabled before it's available. Canon hit some sweet spots in sensor design, for example with its earlier 20D and the full-frame 5D, and the 50D holds the potential of being another model that balances megapixels with low noise and accurate color.
Canon attributes the advance to "newly designed gapless microlenses over each pixel to reduce noise." Microlenses gather light for the light-sensitive part of the image sensor, compensating for surface area occupied by other electronics. Gapless microlenses presumably stretch across the entire pixel width. Perhaps this technology will also help out whatever model will succeed Canon's 5D, my other obvious upgrade path but one that likely would require spending twice the price for the camera body and that would require me to shell out another few hundred dollars for a new wide-angle lens to support the full-frame sensor size.
Fending off Nikon
Higher sensitivity is important for Canon. It's been losing market share to Nikon, which has pushed high sensitivity as an advantage, though with lower megapixel counts. The full-frame sensors on Nikon's D3 and D700 can reach ISO 25,600, though reaching that level was made easier through a sensor design that emphasizes a smaller number of larger pixels.
The 50D has some other features that sound promising, including a higher-resolution 3-inch display, the new Digic 4 image-processing chip, a more dust-repellant sensor coating to avoid image-degrading speckles, HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface) output for nicer output on high-definition TVs, and the higher-speed UDMA CompactFlash standard. It's also got a built-in database of lens characteristics that can help correct for vignetting, the darker corners that some lenses produce.
Photography buffs who know their way around a $1,400 SLR may sneer at dummy modes for portrait, macro, and sports shots, or the new Creative Auto Mode (CA) that offers photographers English-language options such as "blur the background" and sets the camera accordingly. I think that's shortsighted, though: even if you know how to best balance depth of field and shutter speed, perhaps somebody else in your family doesn't. My complaint with the automatic settings is that at least in my camera, they only permit shooting in JPEG. I prefer raw, and even if somebody else is shooting, I'm usually the one who processes the images. (Update Oct. 9: The 50D can shoot raw even in the automatic modes. Huzzah! Another big advantage over my Rebel XT.)
Two areas concern me, though.
First is live view. Canon claims its latest attempt is better, but I remain skeptical it'll match the expectations of those with point-and-shoot cameras who've grown accustomed to framing the shots through the display rather than the viewfinder. Focusing sluggishness and pauses while a mirror flips up and down have seriously degraded live view on most SLRs.
The heart of Canon's 50D is this 15.1 megapixel sensor, whose increased sensitivity now reaches ISO 12,800.
(Credit: Canon)It doesn't bother me much, since I'm happy with the viewfinder. But I have friends who demand it, and I do see its utility for taking shots while holding the camera overhead or low to the ground. Live view also is nice when you want to talk to photographic subjects rather than hide your face behind the camera.
A more personal concern is weather sealing. I'm careful with my cameras, but I shoot sometimes in light rain, San Francisco mizzle, or waterfall spray. And on hiking and camping trips, dust is a serious concern. Full weather sealing is expensive, but it's an area where Canon competitors have been leading the charge, and it's important to me.
Finally, a modern Canon ultrazoom
Another smart Canon countermove to Nikon is the EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens, costing $700 and also due in October.
With a zoom range that long, you can bet the lens will have some serious compromises in areas such as sharpness, vignetting, distortion that can bow parallel lines into a barrel shape, or the chromatic aberration that can leave colored fringes around object edges. But that won't matter much to the large fraction of SLR buyers who don't want the expense, hassle, and bulk of multiple lenses. Nikon's 18-200mm lens has been its best-selling ever, despite a similarly steep price tag and highly limited initial availability.
It's probably not the lens for me, but I know several people waiting for something of its ilk, so Canon is smart to offer it. I'd probably rather put $700 toward a big telephoto lens if I were in a lavish spending mood.
Even then, I confess this all-purpose model is tempting for the next seven-day backpacking trip or Argentina tour when lugging lots of lenses is a huge effort. I have no such ambivalence with the 50D, though. It's aimed squarely at photography enthusiasts such as myself, and you can bet I'll be poring over the reviews to see if the 50D performance matches the promise of the press release.
Stephen Shankland covers Google, Yahoo, search, online advertising, portals, digital photography, and related subjects. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered servers, supercomputing, open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen.
- Topics:
-
Digital photography
- Tags:
-
Canon,
-
50D,
-
Rebel XT,
-
SLR,
-
image sensor,
-
sensitivity
- Bookmark:
- Digg
- Del.icio.us



The boost in megapixels does mean much if the image processing is shoddy. If the sensor/image processing firmware sucks, then it just means your poster print will have more artifacts.
As for the "higher iso = canon does serious work in noise reduction".... that's not a factual statement. Tons of other manufacturers sport higher iso factors, but their noise is unbearable. Higher ISO has more to do with the sensor than anything else.
Now, Canon has a good reputation for great image processing, and likely this will be reflected in the quality of the 50D. Fine. But if posts are misleading, people may buy cameras for entirely the wrong reason and spend money/time/energy wastefully.
I'd hardly call the D300 old considering it just came out end of last year, and costs $1600 for body. It is totally comparable.
And for the record, Nikon makes plenty of cameras for starting students. For non-students, the D40X is great. I started on the D50 and know other photography students who started on D50's. The D80 is another low-cost alternative for beginners. And now Nikon's D60 can also be considered beginner material.
I think your statement was a bit shallow and one sided.
Most everything you say is valid but at the end you say...
"I think your statement was a bit shallow and one sided.", which to me is ironic since that was exactly how I felt about your first comment.
You were the first to make a comment and you tried so hard to not sound bias and one sided but from beginning to end you made it obvious that you had an agenda. I didn't know you were a Nikon user till this 2nd posting you made, but I pretty much assumed you were from your first post.
Its funny how you're criticizing others when you were the first to make a bias comment :).
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-9858266-39.html
More megapixels is often nice, but you're right that it comes at a price. It baffles me that consumers are still so fixated on megapixels, but I do think they're slowly getting more clever. The difference between 2 megapixels and 4 megapixels matters a lot more than the difference between 12 and 14, and people who see the vastly better images produced by a 6-megapixel Nikon D40 compared to a higher-end 12-megapixel compact camera are getting clued in.
Nikon's was bold and gutsy to stick with 12 megapixels for the full-frame D3 and D700, letting the company push to the market-leading ISO 25,600. No doubt they'll eventually come up with some high-megapixel model that works better under studio lighting conditions where ISO 200 is fine, but I give them credit for setting the agenda.
I was thinking 5D replacement
To say that sensitivity and noise are unrelated is a bit simplistic. There are two things that you can do to increase the "sensitivity" of a sensor:
1: lower the noise floor such that the signal to noise ratio goes up (ie: lower the background noise)
2: increase the quantum efficiency in the photon-to-charge conversion (ie: increase the signal for a given number of photons)
There are lots of tricks to deal with both of them, and again lots of noise sources to take care of. The highest performance CCD's in the world have very low noise floors, measured in electrons by the way.
As was mentioned in the article, one of the ways that they're doing this is through microlenses. Given that some portion of the "pixel" has to be dedicated to non photo-sensitive stuff (especially in CMOS devices) having a microlens that can take the light from that portion of the sensor and focus it onto the photo-sensitive device is a good idea. In forming the lenses though, a "gap" had to be formed in the material between pixels to allow them to form right. Having a gapless process will allow more of the non-photo-sensitive area to be "focused" onto the sensitive area, thus an increased signal.
But, I'll bet that there is more to it than that given what they're doing.
I think it's an interesting upgrade. Now, I wonder how improved the AF will be! I'm happy to see the AF microadjustment feature has trickled down from the xD's.
However, like SS, I'm going to see what the upcoming FF model will be like (and cost) before I make any new photographic investments.
With the 50D, you can save images taken with the "dummy modes" as RAW files.
This definitely a winner for a lot of us.
It's good to get digital news from other than 'regular' places. I've waited years for Canon
to produce a 15MP camera with a great new sensor and I almost went Nikon. My 'old 300D'
has done what it could as far as being pushed for larger printing photography and general
photography. Canon seems to have listened to users and responded to Nikon's great stuff
lately. Thank you Nikon. I'm glad I waited for the 50D.
And yes, I agree with the others: higher ISO doesn't mean less noise necessarily, but one would hope that Canon isn't upping the ISO without commensurate noise reduction..
Huh?
Canon has been making the 28-300 for years now...
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/319784-GREY/Canon_9322A002AA_28_300mm_f_3_5_5_6L_IS_USM.html
Make a list of goals you want to achieve with your photography and maybe go to your local camera store and see what they recommend. Also look at the lenses you think you'll need and how much you can spend on them and which manufacturer will give you better options. You can also get adapters that allow you to use a different manufacturers' lenses as well.
I wouldn't ask for too much advice here, it seems like the first few posts are pretty bias against canon and the factual data is not too accurate. They're comparing $1700 Nikons to $1400 Canons, claiming its comparable etc., I don't think it'll help you any. Both Nikon and Canon have great cameras to offer you, as well as Sony.
Best wishes on finding the right one.
-
by jordanjanine
November 7, 2008 9:07 PM PST
- Hello, I am new to the photography business, and I have been shooting wedding and reunions with my rebel xti I have the top of the line lenses, and I am now getting ready to buy a new upgraded camera, I was thinking the canon 40 D, my husband says the canon 50D is the way to go........ I want to use my rebel as my back up, and I want the really expensive lenses I have purchased to match up with my new camera..... where do I go, what do you think?? Thanks so much for any advice.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 27 Comments >>Janine