• On The Insider: Robert Downey Jr Injured on the Set
December 10, 2007 2:17 PM PST

Voyager 2 finds our solar system is squashed

Posted by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print

Correction: The distance from the sun Voyager 2 is estimated to reach in 2020 is about 11 billion miles.

This diagram shows plasma from interstellar space colliding with the heliosphere that surrounds the sun.

(Credit: NASA)

SAN FRANCISCO--Thirty years after launch but earlier than expected, Voyager 2 has left the cozy realm of our solar system, where the stream of particles from the sun dominates space.

You might think that space billions of miles from the sun is a placid, empty domain. In fact, Voyager 2 has been heading outward in the same direction as the solar wind, charged particles streaming from the sun, but things started to get a lot more complicated on August 30, when the spacecraft was 7.8 billion miles from the sun.

There, the spacecraft passed into a new region, where the solar wind suddenly slams into the prevailing breeze and magnetic field left from a series of massive supernovas from 20 million to 30 million years ago, said Voyager project scientist Edward Stone of the California Institute of Technology during a news conference at the American Geophysical Union conference here Monday.

In this area, called the termination shock, the speed of the solar wind drops abruptly from about 250 miles per second to about 60, said John Richardson, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher who's the principal investigator for the Voyager's plasma science work.

Voyager 1, which is traveling faster than Voyager 2 and in a different direction, already crossed the termination shock boundary in December 2004, though some of its elderly instruments are defunct and it crossed during a gap when data wasn't recorded. But Voyager 2 crossed the boundary while significantly closer to the sun, indicating that this region where the solar wind dominates, called the heliosphere, is not in fact a sphere but rather is squashed.

"The termination shock is 1 billion miles closer to the sun in the southern hemisphere than in the northern hemisphere," Stone said, referring to regions of space on either side of plane in which the planets orbit the sun. "There's something outside pushing in on the field of the heliosphere. We believe it's a magnetic field distorting an otherwise spherical surface."

It'll be a while--probably 7 to 10 years--before the Voyager spacecraft leave the solar system altogether and cross into interstellar space itself, Stone said. The researchers hope that will be before the Voyagers' radioactively powered batteries are estimated to run out of juice--sometime between 2020 and 2025, he added.

A Voyager spacecraft

(Credit: NASA)

If you're disgruntled that your own batteries seem to expire much sooner, bear in mind that NASA shuts down most of the spacecrafts' instruments and that they transmit data back to Earth with a 20-watt transmitter. That's much less than most conventional light bulbs.

Their distance from the sun in 2020 will be about 14 billion miles for Voyager 1 and 11 billion miles for Voyager 2. For perspective, that's 148 and 122 times as far away from the sun as the Earth is, respectively. Voyager 1 is traveling about 10.6 miles per second and Voyager 2 at about 9.3 miles per second.

That's remarkable longevity. NASA bet on an initially modest mission to Jupiter and Saturn but planned for the spacecraft to lead much longer lives. With a gradually lengthening series of three-year budget extensions, the spacecraft have made it to Uranus and Neptune, and Stone and his colleagues are now writing the next three-year funding proposal.

The Voyager spacecraft cost $865 million to build and launch and $120 million so far to operate.

Others likely will follow in the Voyagers' footsteps. First will be the New Horizons mission, now launched and scheduled to visit Pluto in 2015. The next planned is Ibex, short for Interstellar Boundary Explorer, a spacecraft dedicated to investigate these outer reaches of the solar system that's scheduled for a June 2008 launch.

Ibex in particular is geared to investigate one mystery that Voyager 2 uncovered. The researchers expected the solar wind particles to be a toasty 1 million degrees in temperature, but in fact they are a relatively cool 200,000 or so, Stone said. "The thermal energy that was missing most likely went into the acceleration of ionic particles," he said.

Also to be studied are the particulars of the termination shock, a fast-changing region. Voyager 2 actually crossed the boundary at least 5 times on its way out from the sun, Stone said, as it traversed the turbulent region.

Stephen Shankland covers Google, Yahoo, search, online advertising, portals, digital photography, and related subjects. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered servers, supercomputing, open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen.
Recent posts from Underexposed
Attention geotaggers: Nikon GP-1 going on sale
Photo world begins grappling with video SLRs
Picasa chief departs Google for Fetch
Sony, Olympus SLRs await Adobe camera profiles
Photoshop supports 5D Mark II, camera profiles
DxO sheds light on camera sensor performance
First Look video: Picoli for iPhone
Google drops Picasa's 'beta' (and pigs fly)
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 16 comments
So What
by spence318 December 10, 2007 3:48 PM PST
Great we can put a spaceship outside our solar sys how come my city can't plow the street in front of my house?? How come the post office can't deliver my mail before 7pm. Let's fix what we screwed up here on earth before we start messing up space. It's allready a junk yard.
Reply to this comment
I'll tell you what...
by technikallyright December 10, 2007 4:11 PM PST
If not for the spirit of human endeavor you would not know what a snow plow is and would likely have little idea of other places beyond a days walk from your domicile. Exploration has provided much benefit to human life and will continue despite narrow minded cries of it being wasteful. Mail delivery has always been slow, even before jet aircraft carried the mail. As fast as we can fix what we screw up here some one else will always screw something else up for us!
They're getting to your street
by aka_tripleB December 10, 2007 5:43 PM PST
But it'll take them 30 years to get to yours.
So This...
by benjwah December 10, 2007 6:27 PM PST
Have you ever thought about the fact that if Christopher Columbus waited until his local city council got garbarge collection and mail service just right, you wouldn't exist?
Sure, your city has problems. I don't suppose the pursuit of technology and knowledge could help at all with that could it?
Or maybe you've elected incompetent local officials. In which case, you are to blame, not NASA.
Because 5000 years from now...
by Penguinisto December 10, 2007 10:52 PM PST
...mankind will likely be living in space full-time, if for no other reason than the insatiable human need for energy and materials to sustain our population (which even with the most drastic but civilized measures, will continue growing whether we like it or not).

Meanwhile, 5000 years ago, the mail was always late, the snow was a pain in the typical homeowner's butt, taxes were too high, and etc. 5000 years from now, these factors will still hold true.

/P
Yeah, right.
by Phillep_H December 11, 2007 2:51 PM PST
"Clean up everything and make it perfect" before doing anything else. There's lazy jerks ready to make more a mess, and prissy-sissy Nazis ready to find "just one more thing" they demand be dealt with right now before any one can do anything that is not their idea to do.
There's a Balance
by tyman703 December 10, 2007 8:59 PM PST
Sure, space exploration can give us wonderful things like Sattelites and Space Ice-Cream, but where do you draw the line? When do you stop and think about the important things at hand here on earth.

The ammount of investment with respect to the impact it's had on society is, in my opinion, a little out of balance.

It's true that several hundred years from now we might look back on these voyages and say that they paved the way for a whole new chapter in life. Or we might discover that Earth is just as good as it ever was and that improving our livelyhood may have nothing to do with finding out the outer realms of our solar system are 800,000 degrees cooler than we thought.

- Tyler

Just for fun: If you were to let that $865 million sit in an account bearing 10% interest for 30 years, you'd have a little over $15 billion right now. Turn around and invest that in something like Breast Cancer Research, AIDS, or next generation energy alternatives and I say money well spent. Heck, even if they just put $865 million towards some of that stuff...
Reply to this comment
...just know where the fulcrum is ;)
by Penguinisto December 10, 2007 11:02 PM PST
[i]"Sure, space exploration can give us wonderful things like Sattelites and Space Ice-Cream"[/i]

...and electronics, and computer miniturization, and navigation equipment, and medical advances (including equipment to detect and research such things as Breast Cancer, AIDS, et al), and climate monitoring (which is how we've been able to detect that we've got changes afoot in the first place), and communications that didn't require 5,000 mile long cables, and agricultural advances, and lasers, and advancements in water/waste treatment, and crash survival techniques/equipment, and food preservation techniques...

...oh, and velcro and Tang.

But yeah - the whole Space Race thing was otherwise useless.

Meanwhile, you might not have noticed, but there are two factors at play: a growing human population coupled with a finite amount of resources. Short of killing off the excess people, Space is pretty much our only hope for surviving as a civilized race, and intact.

/P
View reply
Ditch sports, promote science.
by ben928 December 11, 2007 12:10 AM PST
First of all, science and space is cool!
You think $1b on a 30 year space project is a waste?
Together, the top 10 teams in the NFL spend over $1b a YEAR on their player salaries. Nearly the same numbers for the NBA and the MLB.

Surely space exploration provides a higher utility to mankind than 10 American sports teams (for a year).

The problem seems to be the budget limit. We should try to send the Hubble telescope that far in exchange for a couple of touchdowns by Terrell Owens.
Where is this magic account
by atmx2000 December 11, 2007 6:06 AM PST
Yeah, show me this magical account that is going to give 10%
interest annually for 30 years. What you say, it doesn't exist. Well
then stop talking about $15 billion dollars that doesn't exist.

And I would note that far more than $15 billion dollars has been
wasted already on all of these research areas you think is important
with not much to show for many of the specific ways those dollars
have been spent.
RE: There's a Balance
by protagonistic December 11, 2007 7:51 AM PST
I really feel sorry for you because you seem to have lost your
ability to dream. It is bean counters like you that are holding
back the human race.

As for your $15,000,000,000, well, if you look at all the money
that has been made from the commercial aspects of the space
program, they completely dwarf your little pittance. It is called
ROI, since you don't have dreams that is Return On Investment,
and that has been huge.
Small minds....
by GrumpyDad December 11, 2007 12:41 PM PST
Lets see, I can watch the TV (or the internet) and find out where a storm is and when it is going to hit, saving many lives. With my GPS, it is now almost impossible to get lost. I pop up my wireless laptop in my local starbucks and can conversations with anyone in the world. I can carry a record stores worth of music/podcasts around in my back pocket. When a child goes missing, the entire city can be notified in minutes using cell phones. All from the innovation required to explore space.

Now, the billion dollars a week the US is spending running around other countries, that is money that could be redirected...
No Magic
by enovikoff December 11, 2007 8:19 AM PST
There's no magic here. If you just invested the money in the S&P500 - or rather a stock fund that held shares of those companies - you'd have gotten better than 10% return. It's the reason people invest in the stock market and why its a good bet (over the long term.) However, as others have said, return on good investments, like the space program, is a lot higher than 10%, and faster too.
Reply to this comment
the power of dreams "honda"
by strykernyc December 11, 2007 8:31 AM PST
I agree with most of the comments.
earth is getting smaller day by day and I really hope there is something, some life or anything on space because if not... What a waste of space that is and I hope there is god. instead of wasting billions and billions of dollars bombing another country and killing each other why not invest more in the good things. we should have no more aids no more criminals and we should already accomplished to travel at the speed of light.
Reply to this comment
Damn I knew something was wrong!!!
by DavidJW1234 December 13, 2007 3:17 PM PST
Our solar system is squashed! Geez.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Confessions of a man who does the layoffs

It's easy to vilify the guy who hands out the pink slips. But contrary to popular notions, these aren't decisions that are taken lightly, at least with the executive we interviewed.


Dell racks up Microsoft as data center customer

After finding itself on the losing end of a number of deals, Dell creates a special unit aimed at getting its gear inside the world's largest data centers.


About Underexposed

This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.

Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Underexposed topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right