• On MovieTome: Leaked images from TRANSFORMERS 2?
December 12, 2007 12:02 PM PST

Record heat sweeps Arctic Sea, ice in 2007

Posted by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print

This graphic shows in red the area of arctic ice that was present in the summer of 1980 but missing this summer. At lower right is the equivalent surface area in terms of the size of the United States.

(Credit: Credit: Don Perovich, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory)

SAN FRANCISCO--Warmth may not be an attribute you associate with a place where the sun doesn't shine in the winter and the sea freezes over, but all things are relative. And compared to earlier years, the Arctic was downright sweltering this year.

According to new research presented here at the the American Geophysical Union conference, the Arctic Ocean reached record high temperatures, arctic ice diminished to a record low, and ice melted on Greenland for a record number of days.

"In 2007, we had off-the-charts warming" of the Arctic Sea in the summer, said Mike Steele, an oceanographer with the Polar Science Center at the University of Washington.

Specifically, he said the Arctic Sea surface temperature was 3.5 degrees Celsius (6.3 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than the 100-year historical average and 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than the historical maximum. Two factors were at play in the heating: the sun and, to a lesser degree, warmer ocean currents, he said. In one area north of Russia, temperatures were 5 degrees Celsius (9 degrees Fahrenheit) above average.

This comparison shows the 'off-the-charts' relative warmth of the Arctic Ocean in the summer of 2007.

(Credit: Mike Steele, University of Washington)

There's a feedback loop that connects the ocean temperature and the melting of sea ice. "The ocean absorbs heat, which melts the ice, which means there's more open ocean, which means more heat is absorbed," said Don Perovich, an arctic ice scientist at the U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. "It's a classic positive feedback."

It's no surprise that the arctic ice is shrinking. But the new data gives a specific measurement for how much is gone.

Between September 1980 and September 2007, the Arctic Sea ice dropped from 7.8 million square kilometers to 4.2 million square kilometers, Perovich said. "You can see the Northwest Passage, the shortcut across the top of the world, was ice-free at the end of the summer."

For comparison, the area of ice is the same as all the states east of the Mississippi River and a broad swath of those to its west, he said.

The math behind the feedback loop involves a property called albedo, which measures the fraction of sunlight that's reflected. The albedo of ice is about 85 percent, compared to 7 percent for the ocean.

What got the feedback loop started is a subject of some debate. "The ice-albedo feedback needs a trigger," Perovich said.

Culprits include a surge of warm water from the Pacific Ocean and anomalous winds that may have pushed ice to create more open ocean. And global warming in general means warmer air, which means a later start to winter ice freezing and less freezing when it does begin, Steele said.

Steele estimates that 2007's warm summer will reduce ice thickness by about a meter, Steele added.

With thinner ice, it's easier to start the feedback loop again. "The ice is more vulnerable to a short-term wind event," Perovich said.

Greenland, too, is showing signs of warming.

Red areas here show areas of Greenland where ice melting in 2007 lasted unusually long--the darkest being 30 days more than the average of the years from 1988 through 2006.

(Credit: Credit Marco Tedesco, University of Maryland)

"2007 set a new record, with melting occurring for 25 to 30 days longer than the average of 1980 to 2006," said Marco Tedesco of the University of Maryland.

The rate of increase in melting since 1988 is about 19,000 additional square kilometers each year, about 1.5 times the size of Maryland, Tedesco said.

Greenland, too, has an albedo-related feedback loop. When less snow falls, older and darker snow is more exposed, and this older snow absorbs more heat, Tedesco said. That albedo effect, combined with unusually high temperatures, were responsible for the increased melting, Tedesco said.

Arctic Sea ice melting doesn't increase sea level, but Greenland is another matter: all its water is on land today, so thawing will increase oceans.

Stephen Shankland covers Google, Yahoo, search, online advertising, portals, digital photography, and related subjects. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered servers, supercomputing, open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen.
Recent posts from Underexposed
Attention geotaggers: Nikon GP-1 going on sale
Photo world begins grappling with video SLRs
Picasa chief departs Google for Fetch
Sony, Olympus SLRs await Adobe camera profiles
Photoshop supports 5D Mark II, camera profiles
DxO sheds light on camera sensor performance
First Look video: Picoli for iPhone
Google drops Picasa's 'beta' (and pigs fly)
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 14 comments
Is Global Warming Good or Bad?
by jimvsmij December 12, 2007 1:07 PM PST
I have been trying to do my part to reduce my "carbon footprint". I bought a small 4 cylinder car (instead of my SUV) to commute and I replace all my lights with those new energy efficient bulbs.
But I have been doing a lot of reading this week about global climate change. I read a lot how the scientist have linked human activity to global warming. That seems clear. But what is not so clear is if the effects of global warming are good or bad. Coastal flooding seems bad. Polar bears and some other special becoming endangered seems bad too. Is there anything else that could be bad?
Some other effects that will happen do not seem that bad such as the Sahara dessert becoming a new rain forest, more plants and animals will thrive since plants love CO2, increase sun energy, and the added amount of rainfall and, of course animals love plants and forests. Countries closer to the arctic such as Greenland are now producing more crop and cattle/sheep output with shorter winters and more land to grow on. More energy will be entering our planet which will be converted into more biofuels production. We will be able to both power our vehicles, feed the hungry, and save endangered animals.
So what am I missing? There must be more bad effect because otherwise the good outweighs the bad and we should be increasing climate change not reducing it.
Can someone please help me??
Reply to this comment
Jurassic Park
by jimvsmij December 12, 2007 1:15 PM PST
Maybe it could get bad if the warming trend continues and 100 years from now the earth is as warm as it was during the Jurassic age. Perhaps plant life will be so plentiful that animal species grow to Dino proportions and humans become lower on the food chain.
That could be very bad. Think bus sized meat eating rabbits! Rabbits already freak me out. Why do they constantly twitch their nose??
View all 2 replies
Mass extinction
by arutam December 12, 2007 1:26 PM PST
Does mass extinction seem like a bad enough effect to you?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24732-2005Jan20.html

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/10/1018_051018_fossils.html

http://www.livescience.com/environment/050120_great_dying.html
View all 3 replies
It's the speed of the change, not the change itself
by bjrubble December 12, 2007 2:47 PM PST
The notion that Global Warming is no problem because "it's happened before" fundamentally misunderstands the problem. Just as stopping from 60 mph can be comfortable (with a calm foot on the brakes) or devastating (by running into a concrete wall), it's the pace of climate change that is going to cause the problems.

Through pretty much all of history, climatic changes have occurred over hundreds of thousands of years, giving organisms plenty of time to evolve to new conditions. The exceptions -- whether from asteroid impact, volcanic activity, or whatever cause -- have been marked by massive waves of extinction, which generally have taken millions of years for life to recover. It's worth noting that apex predators (which means us) are the first to get wiped out in these events.

Technology can mitigate some of these problems -- we can move crops and livestock to any habitable locations -- but while we can nudge natural phenomena in one direction or another, we are far from being able to stand up to them directly. If the Amazon basin burns, or there is a massive die-off of photoplankton in the oceans, there's precious little we'll be able to do to recover.
Ice Truckers will have a much shorter season
by superman227 December 12, 2007 3:53 PM PST
1/2 the ice over a 27 year period. That's nuts. Come back in 30 years, those diamonds in Canada will stay there until they build tunnels through the lakes.
Reply to this comment
Very strange
by suyts December 12, 2007 4:41 PM PST
that the warming trends are now being publicized yet the cooling trends aren't anymore. I remember a time when we were all going to freeze to death. (Because of man and his impact on nature.) I live in Alaska for 4 yrs. (88-92) The first winter I lived there, we set records for the coldest winter in the history of the state. I don't know if that has been surpassed or not. The other 3 winters also set cold weather records. For example, coldest November, most snow.... ect. At the time, I wasn't sure about mans influence on the weather, (I surely was wondering) but I was sure that this man had no place there. Today, I'm sure man didn't have anything to do with the cooling, just as I am sure man doesn't have anything to do with the warming. It's just cycles and nothing to get alarmed about.
BTW, has anyone noticed that most climate articles here are impossible to comment on?
Reply to this comment
Wow
by todd_sheets December 13, 2007 6:50 AM PST
I didn't know that President Bush lived in Alaska during his father's
presidency. "The More You Know."
Magma may be melting Greenland ice
by sanjong thapa December 14, 2007 4:44 AM PST
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22246005/

Magma may be melting Greenland ice
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Confessions of a man who does the layoffs

It's easy to vilify the guy who hands out the pink slips. But contrary to popular notions, these aren't decisions that are taken lightly, at least with the executive we interviewed.


Dell racks up Microsoft as data center customer

After finding itself on the losing end of a number of deals, Dell creates a special unit aimed at getting its gear inside the world's largest data centers.


About Underexposed

This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.

Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Underexposed topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right