Why a new $800 Apple laptop had better be pretty
There is something vaguely timber-shivering about every new Apple announcement. Especially for those Isaac Newtons whose head didn't just absorb the apple's bump, but the whole fruit, core and all.
The latest and most exciting rumor is that Cupertino's finest will, in a beautifully timed nod at the fact that most people have very little cash and even less credit, launch an $800 laptop.
This might cause certain elements at Dell and HP to scuttle off to the nearest executive restroom. Although perhaps the most surprising thing is that they would be surprised.
Of course there are those who fear that Apple might suddenly debase its image by pandering to the masses. But just as Target got into design to raise its brand image above the mass of the masses, Mercedes decided to stoop (but not really) into the runaround arena, by getting into Smart cars, A-Class cars. These were products people liked and then appreciated, regardless of their price.
It's not about moving below or above your price point. It's about how you do it.
Appearing at a price point at which you've rarely been seen before (yes, there's Mac Mini, but I think we're talking laptops here) isn't going to suddenly devalue your brand. What is important is not that Apple might launch an $800 laptop, but whether the little thing will be cute.
Apple strokes people's feely bits like few other brands in the world.
And its brand has arguably never been stronger than it is today. No other laptop manufacturer has ever really successfully competed with Apple on design.
Please don't be cross with me, but it seems like every other laptop around looks like the portable equivalent of most General Motors' automobiles. Circa 1992.
So with no real threat at the core of its brand, Apple can tiptoe through its competitors' tulips and check out the undersoil.
I imagine an $800 Apple laptop may have fewer of those function thingies that the more refined devotee might enjoy. Perhaps not. But those who want to pay $800 for an Apple laptop may well be happy with a little less ringing and whistling. Many won't even hear the silence.
Especially given that most of them know that Apple products function in a simple, engaging and human way. That, plus looks, is the real definition of great design.
What is vital, though, to much of the target is Arm Candy Quality: what the new laptop will look like, how it will feel you're using it, and what it will be like to be seen with. Yes, that may sound frustrating for those who regard a laptop's capabilities as the tech equivalent of the Ultimate Fighting Championship.
But if Apple gets the feely parts right (and who can imagine it won't?) then the laundry bills around Austin, Texas, and other centers of laptop manufacture might just rise quite considerably.
Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.







Not that I would be in a position to know...I just like leaving cryptic comments. And I drink beer at B.J.s on DeAnza a lot.
Please provide a link to this. I would like to see it. Especially the display.
Thank you .
/P
I agree that Apple makes really good products. For me, at least. I have never used anything else. Not sure that I could. But I'm still drawn to them first for the looks. And then for the other 'feely' things, like ease of use.
Chris
I can always get a bigger monitor to plug the creature into @ home (same w/ the keyboard and etc), and looks are the last thing I care about (I own and use a very banged-up Sony Vaio Centrino rig).
If it has some decent 'oomph under the hood (with potential for the user to pack in more), I'd happily run out and grab one.
/P
It's just that some folks out there don't look at things quite like you do. I mean, CPUs, RAMs...Lordy, Lordy, you are deep, man.
It's all good.
Chris
Chris
The only gripe I've had against the low-end Apple notebooks are that they tend to have mediocre parts when compared to their more powerful siblings, and that the scale of mediocrity is on a curve. The Mac Mini doesn't suffer that problem. The Minis come with decent hardware that provides a decent bang-for-buck value (though it's a bit of a trial to bump the specs after you bring it home).
Now with a laptop, I don't expect to hop it up like I did my old G4 Mac Cube (where I basically gutted and customized pretty much everything but the logic board). OTOH, I do want something I can reasonably expect to bring up to speed in a small form factor.
I guess what I'm saying is, looks aren't my top priority when it comes to shelling out for a computer. I'll leave that to the folks who, say, happily drop $50 or so extra just to have their Dell arrive in some "custom" color. ;)
/P
Macs always seem to function well enough to me...
Chris
Check out these predictions:
http://navanee.wordpress.com/2008/10/09/14-predictions-for-apple-oct-14-product-launch/
When (if) Apple does come out with this $800 Macbook, are they going to be ready for the new customers in the sub-$1000 market they've never had to deal with before?
"Why doesn't Deer Hunter run on my new Mac?"
"What do you mean I can't use this 5-year old printer?"
"What the hell is Finder?"
Apple's forte' is Mac users, and those folks who are willing to take the time to know their Mac that they are able to afford and spend the time getting to know.
I'm just curious to see if this will open up to another MobileMe situation.
* Deer Hunter (*chuckle*) can run on a new Mac - just get Parallels, and you're set.
* five-year-old printers are not a problem with OSX (my Mac has an ancient HP DeskJet 940c latched onto it - no drivers needed).
* Finder = "Windows Explorer", but better. No more "right-click on My Computer", but instead you get "double click on the square smiling face thingy"
I know what you;re getting at, but seriously? It's pretty easy to get the hang of a Mac.
Trust me - I've had a wild array of relatives and friends stay at my place, sit down in front of a Macintosh they've never seen before, and in less than 10-15 minutes they were reading web pages, sending email, playing games, etc etc. Most of them summed it up in saying "wow - this is pretty easy to use!" I think my mother took the longest to get the hang of the thing, at 15 minutes total (mostly because she kept asking me about the thing out of curiosity more than for any help).
/P
I really do think you are so very right. Macs are genuinely intuitive for most normal, ordinary humans. they simple feel less 'scientific.'
Especially for Mums.
Chris
-
by twyrick
October 13, 2008 2:41 PM PDT
- Stormspace, I agree completely. OS X has made a lot of improvements in the area of networking capabilities and compatibility - but much of what we finally got in Leopard should have been there several versions ago. And in some cases, it seems like Apple even broke compatibility that was there in Tiger. (EG. I was trying to connect to an NFS share on my Linux-based MythTV box from OS X and I kept getting "Access denied" type errors trying to work with the files on the NFS share in Leopard, despite the fact that share was set up completely open for full access to all users (anonymous included). In OS X 10.4 Tiger, it worked just fine.) After a few software "point release" updates to Leopard, it started working for me again, but it's this kind of thing that upsets you, when Macs are known for promising that things "just work" with them!
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 24 Comments >>