• On BNET: 7 tips to speed up a PC
September 1, 2008 11:49 AM PDT

Google 'starting from scratch' with own browser, Chrome

Posted by Rafe Needleman
  • Font size
  • Print

Update at 2:36 p.m. PDT: It's official: Google Chrome will be available Tuesday.

Word surfaced Monday of a Web "comic book" introducing Google Chrome, the search giant's long-rumored open-source browser project. While the illustrations, created by cartoonist Scott McCloud, were not announced by Google, they do contain the quotes and likenesses of 19 Google developers.

A Web comic, reposted on Google Blogoscoped, introduces Google Chrome.

(Credit: Google Blogoscoped)

The detailed, 38-page comic appeared on Google Blogoscoped, an unofficial Google blog. Update: The comic is now available on Google Book Search. The book is broken down into five main sections covering stability; speed; search and the user experience, security, and standards. Here are the key features, according to the book:

Browser tabs will be detachable.

(Credit: Google Blogoscoped)

Stability
Each tab will run in its own process. These processes will be completely isolated from each other, will be killable from the operating system's process manager, and will be sandboxed to prevent them from accessing information on the user's computer. This architecture should lead to a more stable and more consistent browsing experience--performance of the browser should not degrade over time.

Google is using its search index to prioritize testing of the browser--the pages that are linked to the most from Google Search are getting the most automated hits to make sure Chrome is behaving correctly on them.

Speed
The browser is being written with WebKit, the open-source engine at the core of Apple's Safari and Google's Android. The browser is also getting a new Javascript virtual machine, V8. It's said to be a better solution for complex and rich Web applications--it should yield better performance as well as "smoother drag and drops" in interactive applications.

Search and user experience
In Chrome, browser tabs will take over the interface, becoming the primary navigational element. Each tab will get its own window controls. Users will be able to tear off tabs into standalone windows. (Related: developers will be able to control which window controls appear in a tab, creating, if they wish, Web applications that are embedded in a browser but that appear to be more like traditional desktop apps.)

Chrome's URL entry field will be called the "Omnibox," and, like Mozilla's "Awesome bar," will feed you suggestions based on your browsing history and live search results. It will be respectful of users, the comic says: "Inline completions will never flicker, never flash. It's perfect, aesthetically non-distracting."

Chrome will integrate URL entry and search queries into the Omnibox.

(Credit: Google Blogoscoped)

The browser's default start page will show thumbnails of the user's most frequently visited pages and a list of their top searches. There will also be a private browsing mode, as IE 8 has.

Security
Chrome's architecture lends itself to secure browsing. Each Web page, or tab, runs in its own process, and is blocked from accessing other processes on the computer. "We've taking the existing process boundary," the comic says, "and made it into a jail." Different and more flexible permissions are being developed for plug-ins, however.

A database and API to access phishing and scam sites will be used in Chrome (and made public), which will hopefully reduce "zero-day" scam exploits. The browser will be constantly updated with this information.

Standards
The browser will be released as an open-source project. Also, Google will build the open-source local runtime Gears into the browser, and is hoping that it is taking up widely to "improve the base functionality of all browsers."

Yes, this is big
CNET News.com Editor in Chief Dan Farber's analysis of Google Chrome Monday was this: "It would be in line with other Google open-source projects, such as OpenSocial and Google Gears. Creating a competitor to Firefox, as well as Internet Explorer and Opera, could spur more innovation."

"Open sourcing the code is a smart way to avoid the 'Google wants to take over the world' fear, but it seems that Google has ambitions to create a comprehensive Internet operating system, including a browser, applications, middleware and cloud infrastructure."

The browser's start page will show thumbnails or previews of the user's most visited sites.

(Credit: Google Blogoscoped)

No official confirmation from Google yet, although Kara Swisher of All Things D cites sources who say that Google will make a Chrome download available to users by as early as tomorrow.

See also:

Kara Swisher: Google Ignites a New Browser War With Microsoft By Unveiling One of its Own This Week

Click here for full coverage by CNET News of the Google Chrome launch.

Coverage on Techmeme

Rafe Needleman writes about start-ups, new technologies, and Web 2.0 products, as editor of CNET's Webware. E-mail Rafe.
Recent posts from Webware
Hoover's lays out mobile apps for business pros
'Are My Sites Up?' keeps an eye on uptime
Five useful places to find financial data online
Learn how to play guitar in your browser (in 3D)
3DVU announces Way2Go 3D mobile mapping
Box.net to beef up business tools with new hires
Daily Tidbits: Nine Inch Nails is the coolest band around
INQ claims to be the world's first real social mobile company
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 70 comments
by loose_screw September 1, 2008 12:08 PM PDT
Cool.
Reply to this comment
by fugawe September 1, 2008 12:09 PM PDT
Google's Chrome will only eat into the FF and Opera space. IE users won't care, as always. Why can't all these "open" solutions just merge?
Reply to this comment
by JuggerNaut September 1, 2008 12:23 PM PDT
Well IE would have to be open before it can merge and I doubt Microsoft will ever let that happen!
by The j0ker September 2, 2008 2:44 PM PDT
No i think more people use google than they use microsoft windows.

If google promotes their browser on their website, they will become the dominant browser, guaranteed.
by David_G. September 2, 2008 3:10 PM PDT
So False, I'm a IE fan, I never liked and will surely never like firefox, wich I find slower and less attractive than IE, but I'm not with chrome right now. I tryed it and loved it at glance! lol. It's now my default browser and I'm proud to let go of another evil program (I hate M$ but like some of it's product anyway).
by box-builder September 1, 2008 12:25 PM PDT
@fugawe "Why can't all these "open" solutions just merge?" That about as ignorant as asking why won't Microsoft and IE just die?

Open source has as much right as IE does to exist in as many different projects as a community wishes to support. Each has benefited from developments that the others have made. Some more so than others. A few are just more guilty of copying the developments and advances made by others to more degree.
Reply to this comment
by box-builder September 1, 2008 12:26 PM PDT
@fugawe "Why can't all these "open" solutions just merge?" That about as ignorant as asking why won't Microsoft and IE just die?

Open source has as much right as IE does to exist in as many different projects as a community wishes to support. Each has benefited from developments that the others have made. Some more so than others. A few are just more guilty of copying the developments and advances made by others to more degree.
Reply to this comment
by Andy Watts September 1, 2008 12:58 PM PDT
Why Webkit?!
Reply to this comment
by skillingssucks September 1, 2008 1:58 PM PDT
Why not WebKit?
by jezmondo September 1, 2008 2:48 PM PDT
Because it's fast (they actually tell you that). Simple really, building a browser to run applications on? Make the rendering engine fast. WebKit is the fastest available.
by wvdburgt September 2, 2008 11:58 AM PDT
Cause it is fast and it owns.
by R3ap3R1 September 1, 2008 1:00 PM PDT
If this was the case, why did they just renew their contract with Mozilla until 2011?
Reply to this comment
by skillingssucks September 1, 2008 1:56 PM PDT
There contract is for Google to be the default search engine in the upper right hand corner of Firefox. The point of it (from Google's standpoint) is to drive people to Google search.
by skillingssucks September 1, 2008 2:01 PM PDT
Sorry typo, meant to write "the contract"
by SpiritWater September 1, 2008 1:14 PM PDT
This makes logical sense for Google to create their own browser. If it runs on multiple desktop and mobile platforms then you will know their true intentions. They want to up the abilities of their web apps and what better what to ensure the quality and compatibility than to control the browser that they run best in. Plus they get more control of users' browsing habits.

Break the wedge!
www.breakthewedge.com
Reply to this comment
by jezmondo September 1, 2008 2:52 PM PDT
Actually I don't think that's it - they want to make ALL browsers better, this is only partly about getting you to use their browser. It is more about raising the bar for ALL browsers, and even helping other developers build their (better) browser. For Google, a strong ecosystem of browsers is much more important that weird "market share" (of something that's usually free).

Google Chrome represents Google's frustration with the current "state of the art" with browsers, and push that is a direction helpful to Google. I think they are pretty open about that in the comic actually.
by Someone-else September 1, 2008 1:21 PM PDT
I don't know if I'll change FF for it, but it's a must try.

and about IE. IE users are different from Open-source browser users.
IE users just use it because it comes with windows
Reply to this comment
by Fuddyman September 1, 2008 2:17 PM PDT
No IE users use IE because they don't know of any other browsers I always used to use IE until I had problems with (like it sucking) so I looked and found safari and later firefox
by Spatdesk September 3, 2008 12:53 AM PDT
O.K. I agree. I'm a FF fan too.
But don't forget that if you want to update your Windows version you depend on IE, and there are other known issues about using FF. E.G. handling your on line bank account.
At least my account does. ;(
by toosday September 1, 2008 1:32 PM PDT
Is Google the new Microsoft? I have to wonder.

It seems that Google dips their toes into everything these days and have strayed quite a bit from their mission of "Organizing the worlds information"
Reply to this comment
by jezmondo September 1, 2008 2:56 PM PDT
Making sure that the browser you're using is "up to the task" seems pretty "on mission", if your browser isn't up to the job then they can't do what they do (send ads to you in exchange for a service).
by Jonathan September 2, 2008 8:22 AM PDT
There is no problem with Google being the new MS. Its when they start using MS's slimeball tactics is when we have a problem. To date Google has not done this.
Their behavior seems to be that of a 700 foot giant that is clumsy as hell because they don't know how to walk, and chew bubblegum at the same time. They knock over buildings (Questionable privacy on Google.) without realizing it. They sit on a bunch of people (keeps parts of Android closed...then opens it up.) and don't even know it.
And finally the biggest problem that Google has and something I think MS is finally waking up to is that they act as if they are a 50 person company. When you become a mega company your behavior in the market needs to be so clean you can perform surgery off if it. Any type of inappropriate behavior, no matter how small, by an individual or group in the company reflects on the company as a whole, and in turn can and often IS blown out of proportion by the general geek public. OMG! Google EVIL!!! OH NOES!
If they don't have one, Google needs a cultural czar that functions as the company's conscience. And no I'm not talking someone from HR. But an honest to God person who looks at the company from the outside. They aren't part of Google. They take the temperature of Google from the public's perspective. They work for Google, the can communicate too Google and google's execs can communicate back, but they don't get internal group e-mails. They don't get the inside buzz. They are on the outs so they can see what the world perceives Google as.
by chuchucuhi September 1, 2008 1:47 PM PDT
I believe that was page http://blogoscoped.com/google-chrome/ with relation to some of the why...
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider September 1, 2008 1:52 PM PDT
More spyware from Google, no thanks.
Reply to this comment
by skillingssucks September 1, 2008 3:11 PM PDT
Clueless!
by The_Decider September 1, 2008 3:17 PM PDT
Clueless?

You don't know that Google uses all of its software to track users? It seems that you are the clueless one!
by The_Decider September 2, 2008 4:37 PM PDT
What part of Google's strategy do you not know about? The spying or the archiving?

Read this and come back here and apologize for being an imbecile: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10030522-56.html

What part of spyware don't you understand?
by skillingssucks September 2, 2008 6:27 PM PDT
That says absolutely nothing whatsoever about "spyware'. I think it's pretty obvious that you have no idea what that meant.
by xtina-lover September 1, 2008 1:58 PM PDT
I agree with "toosday" above. But at least Google's projects are ciculating around the Web. But Microsoft? From desktop applications to game consoles, from programming platfroms to PC peripherals ... .


But I'll definitely give this browser a try when it's out there. Yet switch to it from firefox?! I've gotten so used to FF & all its wonderful extensions that I seriously doubt I'll do it unless Chrome has something extraordinary up its sleeve. I think we should all just wait & see.
Reply to this comment
by mdshah82 September 1, 2008 2:12 PM PDT
One more channel to push gears... It will probably fill a niche market but will not pose any serious threat to FF or Opera.
Reply to this comment
by 0zSpit September 1, 2008 2:29 PM PDT
i don't see them mentioning "they'll track every move you make". google is spyware of the worst kind
Reply to this comment
by anthony f wood September 3, 2008 3:41 AM PDT
With ANY browser you use, you will find cookies will be placed on your system. Some sites won't allow you to view pages unless you allow them to place a cookie on your system.
Ads are put out to, well, advertise. but your browsing habits are checked up on by many different "outfits".
A few are;
ad.yieldmanager, adrevolver, adspointroll, ads.sun, adsfac, adstech, advertising, artnet, bs.serving-sys, checkmystats, doubleclick, loomia, tribalfusion, on down to zedo. These are the ones who do the tracking of what you do on the net. They are also working hard at putting food on the table and paying the mortgage same as so many of us.
Google came out with a search engine in the '90s that was the best bar none, at the time. Frankly I can't be bothered using another. They have worked hard & long to give the best service for (in my case) no payment at all.
So stop looking in the wrong places for the sinister!
by 0zSpit October 5, 2008 3:59 AM PDT
spyware blaster blocks all of the cookies you mentioned. a very under rated program.
by kjaristy September 1, 2008 2:50 PM PDT
If Google really is developing ANOTHER open-source browser, then what will happen with its support towards Mozilla's Firefox Web Browser???
As a Google supporter, would hate for them to kill Firefox...
Reply to this comment
by Kwasiowusu September 1, 2008 3:10 PM PDT
Google's browser will merely take share from Firefox, and further splinter the open source browsers, which is fine for Microsoft.
Meanwhiule, Google launching a browser with their serach engine as the default, should remove all the objections Google has been putting up with the DOJ and EU, against Microsoft making Live search the default search in IE.
Microsft should be able to make Live serach the default in IE without to much worry about anti-trust now.
This could work out great for Microsoft.
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider September 1, 2008 3:15 PM PDT
Dream on. The type of people who fall for Google's spyware are the same ones that have married themselves to MS. It will not reduce any of the anti-trust problems of MS.

Google is not a monoply. MS is.
by davidspark September 1, 2008 3:26 PM PDT
Don't agree with this. Branding for Google is much higher than Firefox. If Google puts a "Download our new browser" button on the front page, they will steal tons of users away from IE. The Firefox users will bounce back and forth.

It all depends on the deployment of the browser and will it truly do things that Firefox and IE can't do.
by Kwasiowusu September 1, 2008 7:16 PM PDT
The_decider : "Google is not a monoply. MS is."

Google is every bit as much a monopoly in search as Microsoft is on the desktop.
Internet uers who use Google are not in the habit of downloading Google spyware. On the other hand, over 90% of internet users on the planet, use Windows, with IE alreaddy installed in it.
Google has been promoting Firefox for years, and IE still rules. From what I have seen so far, IE 8 trumps every browser out there. It wil take less than a week for big security holes to be discovered in any Google browser that they bring out, even if Google stole the whole browser in toto from Firefox.
by Kwasiowusu September 1, 2008 7:31 PM PDT
@ davidspark : "Branding for Google is much higher than Firefox. "

Nothing on the internet gets more promotion, propaganda and branding than Firefox does. Plus Google has been promoting Firefox for years, and IE still rules. All Google is gping to do when they switch their prmotions from Firefox to Google browser, is take some of the uers from Firefox. I am quite happy for the iopen source communists to fight amongst themselves

@ davidspark :"If Google puts a "Download our new browser" button on the front page, they will steal tons of users away from IE"

# 1. IE already comes pre-installed on every single one of the over 260 million Windows PC's that are curently sold every year. Its irrelevant if Google puts a "download now" button or not. They can't get Google browser into anywhere near as many PC;s as IE does.

# 2. IE 8 beta 2 is currently better than any browser out there. Consumers are going to have a far less reason to switch tgan they had before.

# 3. Google's propensity to install spoyware on people's comouters, and spy on everythung they do, and keep those recorsd on Google's servers , is going tio scare most consumers away from this American version of the Soviet KGB, known as Google.
by The_Decider September 2, 2008 4:38 PM PDT
Monopoly is a legal term and Google has not been found to be one. Market share in and of itself doesn't make for an illegal monopoly.

Google= market share leader

MS = Illegal monopoly.
by Kwasiowusu September 1, 2008 3:15 PM PDT
Any vote for a Google browser, would be a vote for loss of your privacy, having Google track all your web movemnts and keeping records of what you do online on Google's servers, and having Google spyware installed on your computer. The idea is to get all traces of Google out of my life, not increase it.
Thanks, but no thanks.
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider September 1, 2008 3:18 PM PDT
Wait a second. You are an MS shill, the original spyware and enabler of spyware company. How can you object to another spyware company?

Oh yeah, they are eating MS's lunch. Carry on.
by Kwasiowusu September 1, 2008 7:21 PM PDT
The_decider :"You are an MS shill, the original spyware and enabler of spyware company"

Oh Puleeze!
Microsoft sells Windows and Office. No spyware there.
You wanna see spyware, you'd better go to the Apple Mac, which pcks all kinds of spyware junk from Google and others on any Mac they sell.
by Jonathan September 2, 2008 8:28 AM PDT
Kwasiowusu,

You sir are a moron. I don't mean that as an insult, but a statement of fact. Half of Google's feature require data mining. Something you OBVIOUSLY don't understand. You are simply latching onto the opinion de jour that many uneducated, at least when it comes to tech, people throw out when they have nothing meaningful to say. Do you really think that Google is trying to steal your identity? Trying to sell your data? Trying to screw you personally? The minute they start pulling crap like that the house of cards falls. It behooves them to act responsibly with your data, which they are. You are no different then the people complaining about street view in Gmaps and how we are doooooooomed because of the invasion of privacy...then along comes someone to point out you can report anything in streetview and ask Google to remove it via the help function. Again moron. Form your own opinions instead of snagging the tin foil hat wearing fool's opinion.
It makes you look more intelligent.
by SharkZoneDesign September 1, 2008 3:18 PM PDT
Its another browser for web developers to have to test and workaround bugs.

http://www.sharkzonedesign.com
Reply to this comment
by Jonathan September 2, 2008 8:03 AM PDT
If developers stick to standards this isn't a problem. Its when developers cater to a single browser *coughs*IE*coughs* is when you guys get in trouble. You made your own damn mess. Live with it.
by Kreuzer33 September 1, 2008 3:40 PM PDT
Looks to be a HUGE month for Google with Chrome and Android on the horizon.

http://kreuzer33.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-new-browser-coming-soon/
Reply to this comment
by Kwasiowusu September 1, 2008 9:57 PM PDT
Huge month for Google?
You mean by stealing Firefox and giving it another name, and then releasing yet another OS for mobile phones, which the biggest mobile phone outfit on the planet, Nokia, refusing to even look at?
Yeah its "huge" alright..like a worm.
by theBike45 September 1, 2008 3:48 PM PDT
Why doesn't Google try to do something that will help the technology rather than simply function as a new way to unload money from the pockets of web users? I love the way Google presents each new money-making scheme as doing some public good. Now they've stolen the Mozilla Firefox browser and changed it just enough to cause problems for web developers. Notice the complete lack of a set of standardized, comprehensive tests that can be taken by any new browser to ensure that web apps will
work on that spiffy new (and buggy) browser. The web is one giant mass of inefficiency and lies. Google promises to continue that trend. I see us exchanging one crappy monopoly for another crappy monopoly. When will computer people ever learn to demand standardization to ensure that monopolies simply cannot take hold and strangle us?
Reply to this comment
 See all 70 Comments >>
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

In the news now

Yahoo's Decker strong contender for CEO

Sources say the president of the embattled Internet search pioneer has been through two rounds of interviews with the board.


Gadget extravaganza in Las Vegas

CES 2009 is in full swing. Highlights so far include Palm's WebOS and Pre device, Microsoft's Windows 7 beta, and much more.


advertisement