11 troubled Web companies: The next Kozmos?
"We are going to lose some good companies." That's the warning cry from investors in tech these days.
Some we won't miss, of course: the lame, me-too, or single-featured "products" masquerading as businesses. But be prepared. Some Web 2.0 start-ups that are well-loved by many are in serious danger of falling off the cliff.
The problem is that being loved is no guarantee for success. Even being used isn't enough. Remember Kozmo, the munchie messenger service from the last bubble? Not a person who used it didn't love it. In the interest of building a user base, the company was OK with losing money on every transaction in its early days. But when the time came for it to become a real business, it was too late. It couldn't transition to a viable company, and it folded. It was a tragedy.
Here, in no particular order, are 11 online services companies that could face a similar fate. Several of them are 2008 Webware 100 winners. Like I said, popularity isn't enough.

Although well-used by many and even relied upon by some (like me), Twitter has yet to turn on a revenue model. It's not like the company would lose users, if it set up a minor advertising strategy as a test; people want to see the company make some money. Please, Twitter, turn on the revenue before it's too late.
Meebo
This is one of the coolest online communication companies I've seen. I like its products and services. But the revenues for running branded chat rooms cannot be all that large. Meebo belongs under the wing of a larger company like Facebook or Microsoft, but with Meebo's expensive valuation and the coming cutback in M&A, I fear that its exits may be blocked.
TripIt
A very useful service for organizing travel information. Wait, travel? Who's going to be traveling more often during the economic storm we're heading into? People are going to sit at home on their mattresses filled with cash, teleconference instead of go on business trips, and take vacations in their backyards. I fear for this company and other clever travel start-ups.

Zillow
The real-estate site's revenue model is advertising. Real estate and bank advertising. Unless the real-estate research site starts charging for foreclosure listings, I don't see it doing too well in a hunkered-down economy, in which people are trying to hold on to their homes for dear life, not upgrade.
Pandora
People love this product. It helps them find music they like. What's wrong with that? Here's what: unfavorable royalty rates could make it too expensive to run. Survival depends on ongoing negotiations with the music industrial complex. They appear to be going well, but the company is very exposed.
Second Life
The Web interface and social network of the future. Except that it's expensive to run, hard to use, and suffers from empty-restaurant syndrome.
Skype
The revolutionary VoIP service was acquired by eBay, which someday may be seen as its downfall. A noncore service to the auction site, eBay may well want to spin off Skype to maintain focus. But who would buy it at the valuation that would make eBay stockholders comfortable?

Ask
Why isn't it dead yet? It's really a good search engine, and even a small piece of the search economy can generate significant revenues. But running fourth place in a three-horse race is not a good position to be in when the costs of competing are high, as they are in the search market.
DailyMotion
This popular mostly European video-sharing site isn't under the protection of a major moneymaker like YouTube is, and it hasn't yet found a way to offset its streaming costs with advertising revenue.
Netvibes
Here's another product I have used and still like a great deal (occasional frustrating slowdowns notwithstanding), but that has a limited upside as a standalone business.
Netvibes' much smaller competitor, Pageflakes, was acquired earlier this year, and that's what needs to happen with Netvibes. But media companies--the natural acquirers for Netvibes--are about to get hammered by a retrenching advertising market, and that may spell the end of Netvibes' survival plan. (The upcoming release of a Facebook product might help growth, but I don't think that's the real issue Netvibes is facing.)
MySpace
Wounded. Although it's generating a lot of revenue, and under the aegis of Rupert Murdoch, the notoriously ruthless businessman could easily cut loose this social network of yesterday. The momentum is certainly not with this one. This item has been updated from the original post.
See also: The tech downturn: How long and how bad?
And for ongoing coverage: Tough times for tech
Rafe Needleman writes about start-ups, new technologies, and Web 2.0 products, as editor of CNET's Webware. E-mail Rafe.




My top three sites go : igoogle, myspace, my bank. after that it's cnn and a few other news sites..
He put Myspace on this list.
Rafe's just trying to get readers to respond and start talking about him.
MySpace isn?t going anywhere and is central to Rupert Murdoch?s internet plans for the future.
Rafe loses a lot of credibility and proved he?s just out to cause a reaction when he put Myspace on the list.
IMHO
And speaking of Kozmo... a "where are they now" article reported that one of its founders, Yong Kang, moved on to become an investment banker at Lehman Brothers. Yikes.
www.privacy-center.ru.tc
"Expensive to run" should be clarified ? I previously debunked some fallacies @ http://torley.com/debunking-mindjunk-about-the-cost-of-second-lifes-visual-quality
I definitely agree about continuing to improve ease-of-use, but again, specific suggestions here ? and for most of the sites ? would've helped boost understanding, raise interest, and add contextual value.
"Empty-restaurant syndrome" might've been more true a couple years ago, but you're more aware of this because it's more social than surfing the web (and not usually knowing who else is watching the same page).
I find it hard to be alone in SL nowadays, and popular events like Burning Life have been packed with people. Infact, I heard many observations that it was too crowded, and many concerts, gameshows, and other events are like that. This is in part thanks to talented promoters (web parallel: SEO). Also see: http://www.flickr.com/groups/burninglife/
Disclosure: I work for Linden Lab and am posting this to help improve info. More about me @ http://torley.com :)
Twitter is a massive site that is cheap to run and has an addicted fan base. They aren't going anywhere.
Zillow provides a valuable service and homeowners will be checking their home prices like they check the stock market to see which one rebounds first.
Myspace failing? Microsoft will fail before teens stop posting compromising pictures of themselves online.
I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is.
While I do agree with your list I can't believe that you chose to put Myspace on the list over Facebook! How in God's name could you say that Mysapce might be gone and yet facebook, a company that's bleeding money and has no business model in sight and won't have one for 3 more years, is not!
Please explain that one because I'm now starting to doubt your credibility.
best,
Mike
-
by spark9991
October 10, 2008 11:53 PM PDT
- Rafe, i don't use any of these you mention, they are not "needed" services. Even before the credit crunch I didn't see a need for any of them. I tried MySpace and it was too cluttered. Twitter was a waste of time: "hey, I'm brushing my teeth now!" tweet tweet. Come on, these are all for high school kids with too much time on their hands (and marketing sellouts who believe they need to tweet to be "popular").
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 40 Comments >>