• On TV.com: THE GIRLS NEXT DOOR photos
March 26, 2008 9:02 PM PDT

Review: Adobe Photoshop Express beta

Posted by Lori Grunin
  • Font size
  • Print

Adobe's VP of Hosted and Consumer Services refers to Photoshop Express as "the on-ramp to the Adobe digital-imaging franchise." Next exit Photoshop Elements? Construction delays? Slippery pavement ahead? The mind reels with metaphorical possibilities. With its familiar-looking organizational tools, slick Flash-based interface and robust retouching algorithms, Express embodies Adobe at its potential finest--this is a newborn beta, after all, and we should expect bugs. (If it should reach senior betahood, like Gmail, we will cease to forgive.) But there are also a few potholes in this on-ramp to beware.


The good: Slick, attractive interface; useful retouching tools and well-done interface for using them; most operations relatively fast.
The bad: Doesn't support photos from 12-megapixel or higher cameras; some unnattractive Terms of Service; no filtering or keywording; no printing options.
The bottom line: Though there's a lot to like about Adobe's first stab at online photo editing and sharing, you probably want to wait until the company fixes a few problems with the beta--and de-fangs its terms of service--before uploading scads of photos to Adobe Photoshop Express.

Ratings:
Design and ease of use: 8
Features: 7
Performance: 7
Policies: 5
Overall: 6.8

Photoshop Express is two things: a photo-sharing site targeting the millions of snapshot photographers who think software such as Photoshop Elements is too difficult, too disconnected or just too much, and a platform from which Adobe will serve partner sites with editing tools. At beta launch, Facebook, Photobucket and Picasa comprise the short list of partners; Flickr will be next in line, though a date has not been announced.

As a sharing site it's simultaneously pretty and functional. And it succeeds as a proof-of-concept that Flash and Flex allow you to create robust online applications that look and feel like local ones. For sharing, the feature set is pretty typical: it lets you upload photos into albums (up to 2GB), organize them, make them public for sharing or share them privately via email links, and generate and email nice-looking self-contained Flash slideshows. There's lots of dragging and dropping to organize, and a free vanity URL.

For editing, it delivers a better-than-average experience. In addition to a more-than-sufficient set of tools for adjusting exposure, color and sharpness and touching up artifacts like red-eye and fixing blemishes, it also supplies a basic set of specifial effects that let you turn bad or boring pictures into something a bit more interesting. The application also displays a snapshot history of your edits, which is a nice touch missing even from Adobe's desktop products. Most of the tools operate relatively quickly; only Distort left me singing the not-so-realtime blues. (For a discussion of the interface, click through the slide show.)

Similarly, working with the third-party sites seems painless. For instance, you can open and edit your Facebook photos directly in Express, and it sends 'em back when you're done. However, rather than replacing the photo you just edited it adds it. (I'm not sure if that's a problem with Express or the Facebook API, so I'll reserve judgment.) For the time being, all editing must be initiated from Express; initially, Adobe plans to control all development. However, the company plans to release an API later this year that should allow for more interesting solutions.

Express obeys two of my most important policies for sites of its kind: when you send an album link to friends, it doesn't try to fool or force them into registering, and it allows you to upload and download the original-resolution files.

But there's a policy pothole on the ramp that almost broke my axle: Adobe's claims on your publicly shared photos. From the Terms of Service:
Adobe does not claim ownership of Your Content. However, with respect to Your Content that you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of the Services, you grant Adobe a worldwide, royalty-free, nonexclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable license to use, distribute, derive revenue or other remuneration from, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, publicly perform and publicly display such Content (in whole or in part) and to incorporate such Content into other Materials or works in any format or medium now known or later developed. (emphasis mine)

In comparison, even Flickr's (now Yahoo's) TOS will relinquish its claim on your photos if you unregister from the site or make what was once public private. But "perpetual" and "irrevocable"? I'm going to give Adobe the benefit of the doubt and assume someone forgot to put the choke collar on the lawyers, letting something this heinous undesirable slip through. But I suggest avoiding making any albums public until this is changed. I'll update once I get some feedback from Adobe.

Even if you're not as paranoid about TOS agreements as I am, there are still quite a few rough spots in the initial beta. If you've got one of the shiny new 12-megapixel snapshot cameras, for example, you're out of luck: Express only supports photos with both dimensions less than 4000 pixels. There's no way to print--that's waiting on a partnership. You can't import email addresses. There's no keywording or filtering; the best you can do is sort. The uploader won't allow you to select directories, only files, and once you've started an upload you have to wait till it's done before doing anything else. As far as I can tell, however, no great technical hurdles block fixing these omissions.

As you'd expect, Adobe has big plans for the currently free Photoshop Express, which includes rolling out paid premium services and making it a platform to integrate with desktop products like Lightroom and Elements. And though it wasn't mentioned explicitly in my discussions with company representatives, I'm sure video support and integration with Premiere Elements is in the cards, too.

As the foundation for those big plans, I view Photoshop Express with cautious optimism. Taken at face value as a consumer photo-sharing site, the Flash-based interface makes it a lot more fun and natural to use than most competitors, and the editing tools are robust and nonthreatening. Still, I'd wait until the TOS are fixed before making any sort of commitment to the service.

Senior Editor Lori Grunin has been covering digital imaging for two decades, but her memory's kind of sketchy on the details. You can hear about it every week on Indecent Exposure, the podcast she co-hosts with Matt Fitzgerald.
Recent posts from Webware
Googlepedia for Firefox brings Wikipedia to you
Tiltshiftmaker turns photos into miniature scenes
Resumator makes hiring collaborative, paper-free
LG Blu-ray players stream Netflix, CinemaNow, and YouTube
Tech layoffs: The scorecard
Opera's new SDK: Better browsing on the Wii?
Daily Tidbits: GrandCentral making its way to...Spain?
Zuckerberg: New year, 150 million Facebook users
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 16 comments
by scotth92 March 27, 2008 5:26 AM PDT
Lori - the title and therefore the summary, is terribly misleading. This is a BETA (as you note in the body of the article). It's highly unfair to both consumers and Adobe to lead with a presumption that this is a review of the final product.
Reply to this comment
by captain flummox March 27, 2008 8:24 AM PDT
I think Terms of Service are some of the most enlightening documents on the web, though they sure make you work for it.
Reply to this comment
by azwhall March 27, 2008 9:07 AM PDT
Adobe Photo Express, IT LOOKS TO BE A GOOD PROGRAM if you could sign up for it. I gave up after 8 sign up attempts, Adobe kept telling me to verify my email address and told me to check my email for a verification
NEVER RECIEVED AN EMAIL FROM ADOBE ASKING ME TO VERIFY MY EMAIL>
Looking at other photo album programs due to lack of response from aAdobe.
Reply to this comment
by rossmccloud March 29, 2008 8:38 AM PDT
try checking your spam trap. In Yahoo, the email verification response was sent IMMEDIATELY - but it landed in Yahoo's spam trap.
by parthushukla March 27, 2008 10:17 AM PDT
Used it today.....looks very good to me..........the verification takes long time to receive it though........overall........looks good. 2 gigs is not enough though.....
Reply to this comment
by Duke1001 March 27, 2008 10:19 AM PDT
Thought I'd try the new service, wasn't able to get it to work so tried accessing my picasa account and it seems disabled (won't recognize the presence of the sd card in the slot. Went to Snapfish - same problem. I realize it's beta but any clues about how to restore my picasa or snapfish accounts would be appreciated. I uninstalled Adobe but picasa and snapfish remain inoperative.
Reply to this comment
by jerjer1 March 27, 2008 1:40 PM PDT
When trying to join Photoshop Express, it refuses to accept my email address ("address not available"). It also asked that I use another address. Why? I only have one and I don't want a second one. Now what do I do?
Reply to this comment
by xxdesmusxx March 27, 2008 5:07 PM PDT
I agree that this could be a promising web app eventually, but right now the ToS is HORRENDOUS and it's no more useful than Flickr + Picnik.
Reply to this comment
by rossross March 29, 2008 6:00 AM PDT
Great Job on the Review. I played with Photoshop Express the last few days and it works well. I like the very easy to use interface. For now, it does still lack many of the features of it's competitors. Great Potential!

I would like to see you guys write a comparison of Express, Picnik and FotoFlexer.

I use Photoshop Elements now and I would love to get away from the software and move to a web 2.0 service. Adobe Photoshop Elements would do well to create a conversion solution to their other photo products. The Tags (Categories) in Elements do not convert to any other products in Adobe or to their Competitors.

Hey Developers.... there is a great opportunity to make lots of money in this product area...... write a conversion product from Photoshop Elements to Adobe Competitors or to Adobe's higher-end Products..... I'd buy it!
Reply to this comment
by storydavid March 30, 2008 8:08 AM PDT
Hi Rossross, actually, the Photoshop Elements migration is already in the various products.

1) For getting your tags to any other company's app, you can simply select the photos you wish to push the metadata into, and choose "File -> Write Keyword Tag and Properties Into Photo."

2) Lightroom reads the above, but also contains an option for reading a Photoshop Elements catalog and converting it to a Lightroom catalog...don't have it handy right now but look on the File or for Import from Photoshop Elements.

Hope that helps...and it's already free. :)

Dave
by DoctorJerry March 29, 2008 9:36 AM PDT
Signing up was not easy. Waited and waited for confirmation never got it and closed out the site. Checked email and there it was. Once I log on it was OK. Waiting to upload two 7MP pictures was like waiting for paint to dry. But once there, WOW. It was facinating and produced a nice range of options and control over the image. I was not able to save an image unless I overwrote the original-not good. But I was able to go back to the original very easily. I am so impressed that I prepared a 4 page manual for my students in digital photography. It is a program well worth keeping tabs on.
Reply to this comment
by Tigralady April 26, 2008 6:01 AM PDT
Thank you for this review. The concept of edited versions replacing original versions without a choice given is why I am here reading these reviews. Personally I fail to understand why any system would be designed this way. I am having the same problem with Picture Perfect that is distributed with Nikon cameras and have been searching for help. I love Picture Perfect's cropping tool, but NOT the fact that it messes up my original photo file. I want to chose which one to save, and when.

If anyone reads this who has a favorite SIMPLE to use editing software that does not change my original photo file, I'll appreciate the help. Right now I like my own filing system in My Pictures and don't need or want software that messes that up either. Just a simple edit (crop, red eye) and save option.
by DisappointedinPX March 29, 2008 9:54 AM PDT
I think Adobe owes PX users an explanation for why it would build an image editing service that does not allow you to resize images for the web, and does not offer the simple basic tools needed to resize for the web quickly and easily. I'm talking "features" that are fundamental, basic necessities in image editing. What size is the file? What are it's dimensions? What is it's file type? Can I export to a file type that is smaller in file size?

I was so excited for PX because it promised everyday web users an easy way to prepare raw images for display on websites, easily, free, and with Adobe's legendary image expertise behind it. Instead, so far, we've got a blemish removal tool for professional photographers.

Or, perhaps, we have a tool that's real purpose is to draw graphic experts and photographers in to try Adobe, so that it can upsell the desktop versions of Photoshop etc later. Perhaps I've misunderstood what PX was supposed to be from Day 1- is it simply a marketing trial version, a "gateway drug" for your more expensive software? (Sorry for the analogy, but it's the best that comes to mind.)

What we do not yet have is a simple yet powerful tool to empower people to prepare their images for web display that is quickly, easily, and with some style. If Adobe added just some basic functionality re: file size, dimensions, and export to various file types, then PX could get there.
Reply to this comment
by a3nnas March 29, 2008 9:10 PM PDT
I had no trouble registering and verification was quick also. The tool That I use the most and don't see here is the Lasso and the pen tools. I don't really know if PS express for the desktop has these but Photoshop does and the are indispensable for me. I'm not really qualified to comment because I m a fluent user of PS cs2 and FTP software but it was fun to play with. My advise though, Photoshop Elements is reasonable cheap and more features. Also you can get opensource FTP software to upload your phots to your website.
Paul
Reply to this comment
by the53rdcalypso March 31, 2008 2:26 PM PDT
Really the best part though is the automatic LOLCAT text feature: http://www.236.com/news/2008/03/28/photoshop_express_easy_uploade_5508.php
Reply to this comment
by c_sanders April 3, 2008 4:43 PM PDT
hi
Reply to this comment
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

In the news now

Apple: DRM-free tunes, unibody MacBook Pro

roundup At Macworld, Phil Schiller touts 10 million songs sans DRM, plus 69-cent songs, a unibody 17-inch notebook, iLife updates, and more.


Countdown to CES

special coverage The tech community descends on Las Vegas as the Consumer Electronics Show gets ready to kick off in all its gadgety glory.


Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right
-->