top stories

IE 8 to be standards-compliant: Good for devs and users

(Credit: Channel 9 / Microsoft Corporation)

Standards, standards, standards.

That's the general theme of a video about the next version of Internet Explorer, which will unsurprisingly be called IE 8. Details thus far have been scarce, but in a half-hour video with IE General Manager Dean Hachamovitch and Architect Chris Wilson produced by Microsoft's Channel 9, the two discuss the importance of standards, compatibility, and interoperability with the upcoming browser.

We also get a (faraway) sneak peak at a development build of the new hush-hush browser. The key takeaway? IE will finally be able to render the Acid 2 test correctly, which has historically been one of the toughest Web standards and compliance tests around.

Microsoft originally intended to add additional compliance support into IE 7 (including the Acid 2 test), but it didn't make it into the shipping build. It was then put in a lower priority on the bottom of a large "wish list" of improvements for future updates, but to no avail, as Microsoft focused its resources on building IE 8.

No version of IE has been able to pass the test, while mainstream competing browsers like Opera and Apple's Safari have managed to be compliant for the last few years. Mozilla's upcoming Version 3 of Firefox is also set to pass the Acid 2 test, though the current shipping version of Firefox (version 2) won't cut the mustard.

The real importance of standards compliance is a two-party problem: one for developers who have to laboriously make their sites work with as many browsers as possible, and another for the users who simply may not be able to use a site because it's been designed only for a limited number of compatible browsers. The Acid 2 test isn't the final solution, but it manages to put any browser through its paces with a seven-part test.

Still no word on other IE 8 user features--or a release date.

Update: According to Paul Thurrott, we can expect the browser to make its way to users in the first half of 2008. Thurrott also has some details on potential interface changes, including a mention of it sharing some characteristics with Office 2007--sans the "ribbon."

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 19 comments (Page 1 of 2)
by The_Decider December 19, 2007 7:54 PM PST
Too little too late. At least they are admitting that IE7 and earlier are non-standard piles crap.
Reply to this comment View reply
by stevent1992 December 21, 2007 9:33 AM PST
Is it me or is Paul Thurrott somewhat dissing the Acid 2 test, somehow from my perspective judging from the tone of the article, that he thinks that web standards isn't that important, but then take a look at his site and you'll know what I mean about his attitude towards web standards. Its never too late, but it is very long overdue and it is inexcusable that Microsoft have put their nose up to web standards for several years now, its time they learned their lesson and start listening to people instead of their corporate strategy. No more of this crap. IE8 better is the VERY LAST CHANCE, they have, they better fix that interface and they better fix the browser's standards support if they want to earn some more respect in both the web development and accessibility community. There I've had my say.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo December 21, 2007 4:58 PM PST
FF isn`t so great , there have been many times when the text was garbled , and then I rendered the page with IE7 and it worked perfectly ;)
Reply to this comment
by Rod Roddy December 21, 2007 10:29 PM PST
I agree with AppleSuxLeo, FF isn't the wonder browser it's made out to be. Besides, with IE being the dominant browser in the known universe, version 8 will only cement that title what with all it's compliance and all.
Reply to this comment
by Atomic1fire December 22, 2007 6:38 PM PST
Thats because the site was probably designed for IE Just because a few sites are designed for a certain browser doesnt mean that browser is the best choice for you it depends on what you want Standards are just a way of every person and their browser getting equal treatment as far as webpage viewing goes
Reply to this comment
by amaliapa December 23, 2007 12:40 PM PST
Isnt it time that all browser work to the same standard .Why should the ordinary joe bloggs have to suffer the terminal indignation that a program was not built to work with this or that . It is time they berry the hatchet and make peace with each other .let good will rule. merry christmas
Reply to this comment
by jazzy5 December 23, 2007 8:55 PM PST
My question we be, who set the standard? In the past there was Navigator and Internet Explorer. Navigator was first and later Microsoft came in. I know there was the bulletin before that and there was AOL and other internet service that I forgot the name. But the real browser was between these two and so was the browser war. Navigator was the king but IE kept improving with each new version until it won the browser war. It had very little to do that it came bundle with Windows for free. It was a better browser at that time. Please review all the articles from all magazines for that time and all of them said IE was better. As the winner of the browser war, Microsoft had the right to set the standards especialy that they had more than 90 percent of the market, not some bozo the might have a personal agenda against Microsoft. This is a free country with a free market. Whoever builds a better mouse trap get to set the standard base on market share. Micosoft started to sleep on his laurels and did not notice that another small browser was gaining on their market. Fireflox started to build a better browser and when from 1percent to 17 or more percent of the market. It build a better mouse trap. Microsoft woke up and it started to fight back. First with IE 6.0, then 7.0 and now with 8.0, and Firefox is fighting back with new version 3.0 coming out soon. Those two are the ones who should be setting the standards. Like I said before, not some boze that created the ACID 2 test. I have being using both browsers, which neither pass the ACID 2 test and never had a problem with a web page, which tells me many web designer do not care of the ACID 2 test. They build for the biggest market share browser and that is it.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by emoslayer6224 December 31, 2007 10:29 AM PST
IE always suck in comparison to all Mozilla offerings, never has a useful interface, and only survive by marketing to people telling them that its the only browser they can use. If anybody knew anything, this would not e the case, but most people have never even realized that one can install new software from places other than their CD drives. What a joke.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by Ristic Break January 3, 2008 4:28 AM PST
At least Microsoft have an ONLY chance to get over the other browsers (firefox, opera, etc...) and admitting that IE7 Was ''Disappointing'' with its solid interface i think that Microsoft IE wont be the ''Perfect Browser''
Reply to this comment
by bhartman35 January 3, 2008 7:07 AM PST
I can happily report that FF3 (as of beta 2) does indeed pass the Acid2 Test. Whether a person uses IE or Firefox is a personal choice, but hopefully, with everyone using the same standard, it won't matter anymore! :)
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here

New to Web 2.0?

Check out the Webware Newbie's Guides:

Facebook | Twitter | Flickr | Google RSS | Flock
advertisement

Webware

Webware

COOL WEB 2.0 APPS FOR EVERYONE

CNET
Visit other CNET Networks sites: