top stories

Facebook tops one list of 'slow and inaccessible' social networks

On Thursday, Web site-monitoring firm WatchMouse released the results of a study about the performance of 104 social-media sites--social networks, blogging communities, bookmarking sites, and the like--and boldly deemed them to be overall "slow and inaccessible."

WatchMouse used its "Site Performance Index" (SPI) methodology to track the reliability and load time of the sites in question; this figure is computed by calculating the time needed to call up a site's home page and applying a penalty for each failed request. Lower is better: an SPI of 500 is considered good, whereas the Utrecht, Netherlands-based WatchMouse considers over 1,500 to be indicative of "a seriously negative user experience."

According to the study, social networks in general are not particularly reliable: 51 of the 104 sites surveyed came up with SPIs of 1,500 or more, and only six small social networks were awarded with SPIs under 500 (Faceparty, Tagged, ASmallWorld, Flirtomatic, Rummble, and StudiVZ). At the top of WatchMouse's blacklist was Facebook, which it assigned a whopping 6,629 SPI. That was the worst ranking out of any of the sites surveyed--even microblogging service Twitter, whose frequent downtime has become a punchline of sorts. (WatchMouse assigned an SPI of 1,467 to Twitter.)

Facebook has not yet issued a response to the study.

Many of the other poorly-performing social media sites aren't exactly household names, like Searchles (SPI 5,856) and RateItAll (SPI 3,370). Music-based social networks tended to come in with disconcerting indexes, perhaps because of the amount of streaming media hosted on many of them--Last.fm, acquired by CBS Interactive last year, had an SPI of 1,837; the fast-growing Buzznet was assigned an 1,868; and Mog had an index of 1,911.

But according to WatchMouse, many of the highest-profile social networks didn't perform all that badly. MySpace, which had a famous outage in the summer of 2006 when a heat wave crashed its servers, clocked in a rather respectable index of 923. Business network LinkedIn came in with a 1,006. The youth-oriented Bebo achieved a score of 912. And Google's Orkut, third-string in the U.S. but dominant in countries like Brazil and India, had an enviable index of 564.

WatchMouse is only one company, however, and every study's methodology has limitations--just look at the controversy over traffic monitoring statistics. The SPI is based on home page load time and reliability rather than individual pages on a social network--it's monitoring, for example, Myspace.com rather than Myspace.com/whinyemoband. Other performance monitoring firms would likely show different results on a similar study. We've contacted a few for comment.

Originally posted at The Social
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 6 comments (Page 1 of 1)
by January 10, 2008 2:28 PM PST
Facebook has some easy fixes they can make.

http://breasy.com/blog/2007/11/22/facebook-is-slow-but-theres-an-easy-fix/
Reply to this comment
by OneEyeGuy January 10, 2008 3:11 PM PST
I have no idea what the hell they're talking about. Facebook is more than fast enough and it's only applications that are slow -- but that is because most of them are remotely hosted by individual developers, not by Facebook themselves.
Reply to this comment
by tychay January 10, 2008 4:14 PM PST
@OneEyeGuy. It?s homepage only so there is no penalty for the apps.


Somehow I think they got their metrics inverted. My site (Tagged) is #2 on the list and Facebook last? Then again, Facebook has a lot of secondary loads.
Reply to this comment
by January 10, 2008 8:04 PM PST
Who cares! As long as all my friends stay on Facebook, I could care less about other Facebook wannabes.
Reply to this comment
by tsieling January 11, 2008 8:01 AM PST
This is a pretty non-story, more of a press release from Watchmouse turned into a non-story. Without an idea of what Watchmouse deems 'reliable' and comparing that with the expectations of a given website's customers, it's not very useful. One thing it does tell us, though, is that social networking websites don't need NASA-grade uptime to meet user needs.
Reply to this comment
by techcrunchies January 13, 2008 12:07 AM PST
Orkut has 564!!!
That's surprising because orkut is infamous for its recurring 'Bad Bad Server, No Donut for you' messages..Ok, it has reduced a great bit of late, but not that it has stopped so much to afford that rating..
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

New to Web 2.0?

Check out the Webware Newbie's Guides:

Facebook | Twitter | Flickr | Google RSS | Flock
advertisement

Webware

Webware

COOL WEB 2.0 APPS FOR EVERYONE

CNET
Visit other CNET Networks sites: