top stories

There are invitations to Phoenix, the new app discussed in this post, set aside for Webware readers. Read on to learn how to get yours.

As I reported from Demo 2008, new Flash- and Flex-based Web apps are putting traditional desktop apps to shame. The database Blist, the widget maker Sprout, and the photo manager Joggle are all Web-based apps that give up almost nothing to run inside a browser.

Flash-based applications are inherently cross-platform, because there are Flash runtimes that work in Internet Explorer and Firefox; on Macs, Windows, and Linux. (There are even Flash runtimes for mobile phones and set-top boxes, although Adobe's expensive licensing schemes for those platforms do a lot to keep Flash apps off them.) With Adobe's new AIR runtime environment being basically a wrapper for Flash and Flex, we can expect that many of these Flash apps will be released as independent app-like products, but with Flash's cross-platform and Web-native advantages.

Flash has its downsides, of course. It's yet another layer of platform software for an app to run on. For the most part, today's overpowered personal computers and fast broadband connections punch through this inefficiency. However, in some cases, Flash just doesn't offer up enough performance. The personal finance app Voyant, for example, eschews Flash for Java; a Voyant developer told me it's faster at the math his app needs to perform.

Online apps in general have other advantages. Most offer Web-based storage and built-in access to the world's largest collaboration network: the Internet. Nobody likes hassling with LAN-based workgroup software installations, and with Web apps you don't have to.

And I'll tell you this: I'm not seeing nearly the same creativity today in traditional software that I am seeing on Flash and in browser-based apps. Flash-based apps are finally beginning to compete head-on with standard software. Many new Flash apps aren't just different. They're better.

Even rich media apps will fall

Case in point: the Aviary suite of graphics apps, coming out soon from the team at Worth1000. The first app, the image editor Phoenix, will make you question the value of your Photoshop license. Not that it's a drop-in replacement for Photoshop today, but it gives you a strong indication that the need for expensive apps licensed on a per-PC basis is ending.

Who needs Photoshop?

(Credit: CNET / Rafe Needleman)

I experimented with Phoenix a bit. I can't give it a deep review, since I'm not an expert in image editing. However, it certainly does a lot of the things I've done when poking around in Photoshop: It has rich tools for selected image elements, layering items you're working on, and transforming parts of the image. Lacking, of course, is plug-in support and Photoshop's snappiness when it runs on a fast PC. But the capability to open an image directly from a URL is pretty cool, and I would fully expect to see the capability to write files right back soon as well.

Other Aviary graphics apps to come include a color palette creator, an "algorithm-based pattern generator," a vector editor (competitor to Adobe Illustrator?), a 3D modeler, and other non-graphics tools such as a word processor, an audio editor, a "music generator," plus a network file storage system and a marketplace for the exchange of creative works.

The full rundown of tools the team hopes to build sounds hopelessly ambitious and reminds me of Zoho, which has a too-big suite of not-quite-developed online productivity apps. Probably a better strategy would be to focus on the key moneymakers and open up a plug-in platform so other developers could add to the ecosystem. But I don't really want to critique the company before the first app is even out of beta.

In fact, I want to encourage this crazy ambition. If Worth1000 can build a suite of professional media creation and management apps all at once using new Web platforms--and even if it tries but in the end cannot-- it could encourage other developers to stretch beyond today's current Web 2.0 apps. We certainly could use more real Web apps, and fewer me-too social networks or developers' resumes masquerading as products.

See also: Picnik; and watch for Adobe's own Photoshop Online.

If you want to try out Phoenix, there are 100 early-bird invitations set aside for Webware readers. Go here to enter your e-mail address. You have to click over from this story to get on the list--cutting and pasting the link won't work.

 
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 10 comments (Page 1 of 1)
by Subcomandante.Fritz February 11, 2008 4:43 AM PST
The link for the invite doesn't appear to work any differently then just entering the address. I don't think it is working. Jason
Reply to this comment View reply
by mhinnewyork February 11, 2008 4:14 PM PST
To insure you are running the latest version of Flash, and only the latest version, see A heads-up on the Adobe Flash player http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13554_1-9858449-33.html
Reply to this comment
by b_baggins February 12, 2008 7:41 AM PST
Dot-com crash 2.0 is coming soon to an internet near you. It's the same old story all over again. All these companies re-creating existing products, but on the internet, and not one comment or analysis on how in the heck they plan to make any money at it.
Reply to this comment
by jbhaber February 12, 2008 1:40 PM PST
A replacement for Photoshop? How does it handle RAW files? How about multiple RAW files open at once. How about an entire library of RAW files? Not in the short run it won't replace PhotoShop.
Reply to this comment
by thartist February 12, 2008 3:29 PM PST
Uhm. Had this writer been an artist and not a Cali web 2.0 evangelist, this article would have never been written. Why would I want to use these lame web 2.0 toolsets which do cookie cutter design work, when I can have precise control while using my Adobe suite. I..uh...also would like to use the dual core Intel on my main desktop and the 2 gig of up front cache that I have customized on my mobo. Why in the world would you want to confine me to the slow insides of web 2.0 architectures which are slow, subject to 404 errors, and last but not least...SECURE ! Frankly, I don't know how this writer gets a paycheck. So he dabbled in this and dabbled with that and came up with the Flash Apps are taking over ? What the... Next time, do some real journalism. I want to see figures proving this. What are the penetration rates of these flash apps, who is buying them (major studios ?), and what exactly is the adoption rates ? Until then, leave the multi-thousand dollar graphic packages to the people that know how to use them.
Reply to this comment
by JohnnyL February 13, 2008 7:53 AM PST
The reviewer is too much of a web 2.0 evangelist to be taken seriously with this reveiw or anything similar. here's his review in a nutshell: 1)Phoenix is flash based, in browser image editor 2) It works 3)Flash apps will take over the world Maybe one day, with very high broadband connections, web based apps may approach the sophistication of desktop apps but that day is far in the future. I would rather see some of these early apps try to integrate with the desktop a little more instead of trying to be 100% web 2.0. Right now I don't trust any of these startups to be around very long and online storage can disappear in an instant.
Reply to this comment
by stevejg61 February 16, 2008 3:09 AM PST
A big issue with Flash based apps will be the US military. It is too long to enter here, but it gets down to the fact that Flash is restricted there due to the fact that it can be used to run malicious code (but MS apps are still OK)
Reply to this comment
by salpern February 16, 2008 5:28 AM PST
Interesting comments that sound like "if man were meant to fly, he would have wings." I don't see the "Cali web 2.0 evangelist" writer of the article saying web-based apps are good for everything (or any comments about how storage will be done). But then aircraft capable of carrying full-sized tanks and other large military vehicles were once thought to be impossible to build. Marketing & profits? It seems that remains to be seen. From the comments above, perhaps top of the line graphics arts people (like my oldest son) won't jump on much of what wil be available soon, but as for the future... who knows?
Reply to this comment
by February 16, 2008 10:38 AM PST
Good comment, salpern. Plainly, the online photo editing apps are not meant to replace Photoshop. They are quite obviously for folks like my mom and dad who want to crop me and my wife out of any picture involving our beautiful daughter - and that's fine. In other words, these apps will be a home run hit with 98% of the current computer user base. The same discussions popped up with Google Docs and Spreadsheets ("Yeah, but can I open a 3GB data set in my browser??!?!?") Why on earth would my parents spend $600 on a PS license, or even download and install something for FREE - it's simply too complicated for them most of the time. Much better to go to www.someapp.com and work there.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software