• On TV.com: THE GIRLS NEXT DOOR photos
March 7, 2008 5:11 PM PST

Google to penalize advertisers with slow-loading pages

Posted by Elinor Mills
  • Print

Companies advertising on Google's AdWords system better fine-tune their ad landing pages.

In its automated auction system, Google will soon be looking at the length of time it takes to see an advertiser's landing page once an ad is clicked as a factor in determining ad position and minimum bid for keywords.

People are more likely to abandon landing pages that load slowly, Google explained in its Inside AdWords blog.

I want to emphasize that I agree with the Google statement that people abandon pages that load too slowly.

Originally posted at News Blog
Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
Recent posts from Webware
Music and browsing take flight in Songbird
BlackBerry's mobile Web site gets a refresh
Zagat on iPhone: 'A disappointment' die-hards will still 'love'
Facebook Marketplace relaunch powered by Oodle
Gmail comes to the desktop in gadget form
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 18 comments
I hate sloooooooooooooooow
by Rick Mc Callister March 7, 2008 5:45 PM PST
You ma man! Kick them slowpokes from hell to breakfast!
Reply to this comment
hmmm...
by cb3431 March 7, 2008 6:33 PM PST
I abandon a site if it says ads by...

Isn't a search engine supposed to return results based on how relative the site is to the search criteria?

I'm glad I use ask.
Reply to this comment
You're cluless!
by cnetcensorssuck March 7, 2008 8:29 PM PST
<eom>
rofl, cluEless idd
by Endlezz March 8, 2008 2:12 AM PST
Ask is even worse if you Ask me :p
Advertisements
by cycledoc March 8, 2008 5:49 AM PST
I avoid all formal ads that intervene on a page, fast or slow. As a result, many pages are not only unattactive but also virtually unusable.

I'm most likely to respond to an ad encountered in a search if it is gemane. I will pay no attention to or try to block the most intrusive.

There is a tradition in the U.S. to find ways to charge for what was formally provided "free." This is coming to the internet with ISP's charging for faster email service, priority ads etc. It will be too bad, as TV has become unwatchable and in the future the internet may become unusable.
Reply to this comment
Free
by Phillep_H March 10, 2008 9:56 AM PDT
Most of that "free" stuff was paid for by someone.

> There is a tradition in the U.S. to
> find ways to charge for what was formally
> provided "free."

There is a tradition in many parts of the world for government officials to try to find some excuse to charge you for whatever you are doing in order to make money off it. It's called "soliciting a bribe". Our news media does not talk about it and teachers in our schools don't ever mention it because it makes the US (and Britain, and Canada) sound better than some of these other countries, "implicite criticism of other cultures, etc.
View reply
Not a problem for me.
by Dead Soulman March 8, 2008 7:54 AM PST
With ABP, surfing the web is dandy. I only turn it off on pages that I think would need the money. But, MSN, FoxNews, and other big corporates like that, ABP to the rescue. Besides, if ads were not annoying and delay the loading of the page, I may not be bothered by it. However, too many sites have gone Flash-heavy without any regards for how it'd affect loading time. Then, you have the annoying flashing boxes and neon colored text that give me motion sickness. I don't think so. Websites owners need to learn how to keep it balanced.
Reply to this comment
Extra software not necessary
by ghostofitpast March 8, 2008 8:24 AM PST
Why install software when your browser has a command to stop loading the page? Once I see what I need, I shut off the rest of the junk. That seems to work for most of the annoyances on Web pages I want to see.
View all 2 replies
Not a problem for me either!!! :-)
by Glynist March 8, 2008 11:56 AM PST
I have a few different websites for different purposes but all of them have been written with a fast page load in mind. I can't stand waiting for Flash pages to load only to find out that actually there's no information, just flashing graphics that don't mean a thing!! One of my websites www.costablancaclassified.com is intended for English speaking people in Spain - the beautiful, relaxed country that I choose to live in, but an area where 1/2 meg Internet is a luxury, where a day without power cuts is a bigger luxury, and therefore, where fast loading pages are essential - any why not? If we wanted graphics we'd go to a gallery!
Not a problem II
by Glynist March 8, 2008 2:12 PM PST
I have a few different websites for different purposes but all of them have been written with a fast page load in mind. I can't stand waiting for Flash pages to load only to find out that actually there's no information, just flashing graphics that don't mean a thing!! One of my websites www.costablancaclassified.com is intended for English speaking people in Spain - the beautiful, relaxed country that I choose to live in, but an area where 1/2 meg Internet is a luxury, where a day without power cuts is a bigger luxury, and therefore, where fast loading pages are essential - any why not? If we wanted graphics we'd go to a gallery!
Reply to this comment
Do they count mod_deflate in the evaluation ?
by My-Self March 8, 2008 8:21 PM PST
I hope they take in account the Apache extension mod_deflate that compresses HTML pages on the fly as it's effect on long/complex pages for users with a slow connection is extremely important.

http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_deflate.html

If they do, that might convince more web hosts to enable this on their servers.
Reply to this comment
Slow from where?
by rturner2 March 8, 2008 9:08 PM PST
Where does Google ping or check your site from? Perhaps it is slow overseas but in your own country you are advertising / targeting it loads quickly due to peering vs slower international links?
Reply to this comment
Ironic...
by Riquez-001 March 9, 2008 1:26 AM PST
... since it's usually the ads that slow down the page.
Reply to this comment
Not ironic
by t8 March 9, 2008 1:35 PM PDT
Google ads are extremely fast to load. Otherwise Google would be penalizing themselves and all websites that display Google ads.

You really don't think that will happen do you?
View reply
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

In the news now

A tech veteran responds to the recession

LogLogic's Patricia Sueltz heard a clear message about the economy from investors, but she already knows a thing or two about navigating through tough times.


Obama's AG pick on privacy

Eric Holder has criticized the warrantless wiretapping program, but his views on other online policies may not be that far from those of the Bush administration.


advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right