top stories

Why broadcast TV sucks, AKA the rise of web video

We are living in the era of crappy live TV and people are noticing at last. The impending launch of Hulu has me thinking about what exactly it is that makes watching broadcast TV almost unbearable. First, let me clarify that I don't think that the content sucks, just the way that it is served up. I think that I have broken the problem down into three major points: ads, schedule, and attention.

Ads

Commercials have long been a point of pain in any TV watcher's experience. They are a necessary evil. Without the commercials, there is no content. However, I think that an advertising model like Hulu's makes for a much more tolerable experience. Standard broadcast TV has a few three minute commercial breaks, where Hulu has short 30 second breaks, with an unobtrusive sponsor logo in their bottom right corner. YouTube uses more traditional web ads and corporate partnerships.

It's obvious that the networks are not going to change their views on broadcast ads and this is part of the reason why so many of us are turning to TiVo or other DVR's as our primary means of watching TV. If a more tolerable model, such as Hulu's, was in place, maybe we wouldn't be so quick to reach for the remote to fast forward.

Advertising is the reason that sporting events are valued so highly today by TV networks. For the most part, people like to watch sports live. Everyone needs to know the result as soon as possible, so they are forced to watch the ads. Such is also the case for the show with the biggest ratings of all time, American Idol. The show has a loyal following and cashes in on advertising because all of those people watch it live. Shows such as Lost don't enjoy that luxury and even though they are popular, they don't have to be watched live. This is where the internet, with its infinitely flexible schedule can help.

Schedule

Broadcast TV has owned our schedules for far too long. TiVo helped to show us the way in breaking out of TV schedules. Web video takes it to the next level. We are at the point where you can watch most TV shows on the internet only a day or two after their original air date, regardless of when they happened to be on.

One of the huge problems with broadcast TV is that it is impossible to have something on that everyone likes at all times. When you are actively making the choice on what to watch (as you do with web video), you are far more likely to be watching something that you actually want to be watching. Fixed schedules are dead to me. I think that it's clear, at this point, that we want our content on demand.

Attention

There are a lot of things competing for our attention. It's rare that we get time to actually sit down and devote all of our attention to a TV show. As I'm writing this, I've got IM windows open, my email inbox, begging me to go through it, and Adult Swim on my TV. This is precisely why it is so important that when you get quality time for entertainment, you are watching what you want to watch.

Some people attribute the success of YouTube to our attention spans decreasing. I tend to think that people love YouTube because it provides entertainment in short bursts. If you don't like a YouTube video, you probably only lost about 45 seconds of your life, so there is little risk. Full length TV shows, on the other hand, require more of a time commitment.

People don't mind giving a show their full attention if the content is quality. Making shows like Heroes available for viewing on demand, for free, simplifies the search for great entertainment. Our attention spans aren't decreasing, our tolerance for bad entertainment is.

Broadcast TV is alright for a passive form of media. I tend to think of it more as background noise, while something else takes the better part of your attention. I consider watching a show of your choice to be an active form of media since you are actually engaged with the content.

Conclusion

I would really like to say that broadcast TV is dying, but it just isn't. Ratings for shows like American Idol tell us that broadcast TV is as strong as ever. Sports are almost always consumed live on broadcast TV and news shows like NBC Nightly News have hugely loyal followings. However, I am seeing a big shift in how we view content that is not time sensitive.

People who are fed up with poor content, obtrusive ads, and fixed schedules are flocking to the internet. Sites like Hulu are our saviors in this age of crappy live TV. The TV networks realize what is happening and that is why they are supporting this reinvention of TV. We are in the era of on demand and more and more people are beginning to see the light.

Originally posted at The Web Services Report
Harrison Hoffman is a tech enthusiast and co-founder of LiveSide.net, a blog about Windows Live. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 10 comments (Page 1 of 1)
by riffkind March 11, 2008 12:01 PM PDT
I agree that scheduling and ads degrade the broadcast TV experience. But I disagree that the content is poor. The networks and a select group of cable channels are producing a higher quality of TV than they were 10 years ago. The demand for DVR is as dependent on good content as it is on time-shifting and on ad-skipping. With so much good content .people are clamoring for technology to help them consume it all.
Reply to this comment
by harrisonh1 March 11, 2008 2:12 PM PDT
Riffkind, I agree with you that the content is good overall on TV. There are certainly networks and shows that are doing it right. That's why I said, "First, let me clarify that I don't think that the content sucks, just the way that it is served up." in the first paragraph. I mentioned poor content in the conclusion because I think that if you watch live TV, you are inevitably going to have to watch some bad content (I mean, come on, Wife Swap?), but that is more a result of fixed schedules and lack of freedom.
Reply to this comment
by grmertz March 12, 2008 5:25 AM PDT
My beef is with TV ads, I subscribed to Sat. HD programing to get away from ads. The HD channels like Discovery and Food had an ad every 15 min. now after 1 year they are also packed full of ads. The DVR is OK but a half hour show ends up being 20 min. or less. Even watching a race last Sunday an ad superseded the action on the track. End result is I watch very little TV and buy seasons of shows and movies on DVD to watch. My time is more valuable then wasting 10 min. out of every 30 min. Good article, Thanks
Reply to this comment
by acemannw March 12, 2008 6:13 AM PDT
I never watch live telivision anymore. My wife and opted for one of the new HD DVR boxes from our cable company when it was available it has changed how we watch television forever!!
Reply to this comment
by will2348 March 12, 2008 8:38 AM PDT
Hi, I live in the UK and i only get 100 free channels £70 more a month for around 900 channels. But what i don't understand is in the UK prime-time saturday night at the moment we have a show called "Ant & Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway" the show lasts 75 minutes and is really funny and complete quality but they only take an advertisment break once every 20-25 minutes and even the advertisments only last around 3 minutes. So why can't they do that in the USA? Because TV companies over here just keep on growing it's not like there losing money.
Reply to this comment
by jag3100 March 12, 2008 10:15 AM PDT
Funny how Harrison complains about ads, yet around 50% of this page is ads!
Reply to this comment
by mlestan March 12, 2008 10:54 AM PDT
First of all, great article. I know a lot of people that feel this way about television. But the fact remains, advertising will always be a part of broadcast television. What I have done to deal with this is accept the ads as a supplementary form of entertainment. Sure, there are ads that are ridiculously boring. However, nowadays, more and more ads are becoming humorous and gaining a following. Take, for instance, the Caveman commercials for Geico. For some of you, this will be a HORRIBLE example because an AWFUL TV show spawned from them. But put that aside for a moment. These commercials contained some of the wittiest, non-abrasive comedy on television as a whole. The airport walkway commercial is a great example. Yes, I do have a DVR, and yes, when i am watching a recorded program, I do fast forward. But there have been times that I will stop and rewind to catch a commercial that I may have missed that looked funny or well done. And this bit about how programs are 20 mins or less? If you buy the seasons on DVD, they STILL will be 20 min or less. So I don't get why that could be a complaint of yours. All in all commercials are here to stay and you can either embrace them as entertainment and information to consumers, or battle them like this guy has done. Either way, it's personal opinion on how you feel about them. But if you think that commercial interruption will EVER go away, you are mistaken. If that's what you want, subscribe to HBO, Cinemax, or other premium channels.
Reply to this comment
by March 12, 2008 11:09 AM PDT
here's a question about content. Why must we be tied down to content created in the u.s. There are plenty of great programming from the U.K., Australia, France etc. IPTV should go beyond the bounds of whats going on strictly in our country. If you do that then you will end up with higher quality. For example, for sporting events like tennis you get scant coverage via u.s. broadcasters but if you were to get a feed from the europeans you would see all the matches you will ever want to see. I don't blame the us broadcasters too much for that since the demand is lower in the us. But at the same time I shouldn't get stuck with no option when in reality there are options.
Reply to this comment
by wmclover March 12, 2008 3:05 PM PDT
Watched 30 Rock full screen on my 50" hdtv, which is cloned to my computer. The video was watchable but clearly not high definition. It was necessary to disable the hardware accelerator setting on Flash to view the video in the full screen mode on my Vista computer.
Reply to this comment
by krustykanuck March 12, 2008 3:45 PM PDT
I work in the telecomm industry developing boards for digital video transmission. Some of our newer stuff would enable TV viewers to tell the cable companies when you want to watch your show (with or without Tivo). The data transmission rates and interactive content on our newest cable/satellite boxes are being fine tuned to allow proper two way communication between the user and the cable service provider industry. It is a slow process in getting this technology adopted due to the expense of upgrades and debugging the new technology. We have begun tests in a few select communities in the Eastern USA. We hope in time that you won't have to telephone to vote for American Idol either, just vote with your remote.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here.

New to Web 2.0?

Check out the Webware Newbie's Guides:

Facebook | Twitter | Flickr | Google RSS | Flock
advertisement

Webware

Webware

COOL WEB 2.0 APPS FOR EVERYONE

CNET
Visit other CNET Networks sites: