top stories

(Credit: MySpace)
For most people, updating your MySpace or Facebook profile is not news. Sure, it might appear in your news feed on the site, but that's just about as far as the story is likely to travel. For Ashley Alexandra Dupre, the woman who reportedly worked as an escort and whose clients included former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, not only has her social networking become a significant news item, but it's even possible that her life-long dream of becoming a professional singer may turn into a reality as a result of getting caught in the prostitution ring that brought down a New York Governor.

In a CNN article that's been updated on at least one occasion, Mallory Simon details the activity on Dupre's profiles at both MySpace and Facebook since the time her identity was publicized by the New York Times earlier in the week. According to Simon, "It seemed she was trying to stay one step ahead of journalists, attempting to limit what information they could access."

The damage control was not limited to deleting scantily clad photographs and embarrassing comments from the past but also involved deleting contacts in her network as well. Simon points out that both Facebook and My Space are used by journalists to gleam background information on their subjects and suggests that, "She was seemingly aware that the press would have access to her friends and every word, photo and comment on her profiles, so she began by deleting connections between her friends on Facebook."

In addition to citing the views of two experts on internet privacy, Mallory Simon provides what almost amounts to a play-by-play of Dupre's internet activity stating that "she was staying up all night cleaning up her profile," and outlining the posts she made at both 3:00 and 5:00 a.m. Simon concludes her account by noting that the profiles from both Facebook and MySpace had been deleted by 2:30 p.m. on Thursday but that they "reappeared Friday." It looks like only the MySpace profile is currently active so perhaps Simon is overdue for an update on her investigative profile.

This instantaneous obsession with Ashley Alexandra Dupre is insane, but it shouldn't come as a surprise. Back in 1995 when Hugh Grant was caught in a compromising position with Divine Brown, she too became a fleeting celebrity and was reportedly able to milk $1.65 million out of the controversy.

Clearly the culture is more infatuated with celebrities, both traditional and unconventional, than ever before and it seems that Ms. Dupre may be able to continue riding that wave for at least a while longer. Her single, "What We Want" has been downloaded by several million people and the track managed to get radio airplay in New York, but according to MTV News the song's radio play is already fading fast.

It's unclear whether Dupre will be able to sustain her role in popular culture, or even if she intends to try, but she's probably the only person not accused of a vicious crime who has ever had their online activity followed so closely by the media and she'll always have that, just like her and Eliot will always have Washington DC.

Then again, I'm sure he wishes he would've fallen sick and canceled the rendezvous. The question is:

Does she?

 
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 7 Comments (Page 1 of 1)
by madcasey March 14, 2008 3:39 PM
Just read a great post about this on some blog. I think CNN is being exploitative, and that article tracking her every online movie is kind of disturbing to me. And like the blogger said, even their original post quoted her MySpace page as if they had interviewed her. It's just a joke to me... really tacky stuff from a reputable news organization. But in this blog he asks the question: how ethical is it for a journalist to pull their content and information directly from a Web 2.0 source for their own profit, with hardly any credit -- not even a link -- given to the person who created that content? And I'm not talking about issues of legality or privacy -- know our society rejected individual rights to privacy decades ago. But I'm talking about ethics and integrity. 25 years ago CNN's articles would've been called plagiarism, but since no one cares about an individual's time and effort when it comes to the internet, it's just good business. Sure she'll get fifteen minutes of fame from this, and probably make quite a bit of money. Will it be on a par with the amount of ad revenue CNN got from two days of wall to wall coverage pulled straight from her words and photos? Not at all. I don't know if I'm allowed to link to other blogs, but here is the link: http://www.markcaseyonline.com/tag/eliot-spitzer/
Reply to this comment
by nyckate March 14, 2008 11:33 PM
Are they for real? Alleged sexual encounters?? How about alleged acts of prostitution and while she may be an aspiring singer most aspiring artists are living in and sharing teeney apartments - this one was living in a $3600/month toney apartment in the iron district - she was a prostitute cause she wanted to maintain a cool lifestyle not to feed her kids or pay for recording sessions. Sheesh.... what's next - Kristen to start teaching How to Be a Prostitute in the Learning Annex?? Her former pimp from her other escort service was on Larry King last night - there' s no doubt that this is simply a prostitute - she may want to be a singer but she's not working for that and this wasn't her first job or company as a prostitute. Let's stop glamorizing hookers and prostitutes - its not a career choice - its not something most of us ever want our kids to chose to do --or worse again be forced to do. Which is the other aspect of this thing about making Kristen the newest IT girl - there are hundreds of thousands of girls, boys, teens and sex slaves forced into sexual prostitution. Kristen had a choice and made a bad choice - but now that the media is glamorizing her and her ummm 'occupation' what do we tell the kids??
Reply to this comment
by thecrazynews March 15, 2008 8:02 AM
Im pretty sure CNN copyed me. I have written a big article on my blog http://hottiesinthenews.com and I reckon CNN found this and stole the info from me. Then again maybe I should be working for CNN if this is what they call journalism. I mean you would expect this from Fox News but geez.
Reply to this comment
by zildjianpilot March 15, 2008 8:36 AM
Great write-up. I knew as soon as I saw in the NYT quoting extensively from her profile that this was an indication of a huge change in journalism. Check out my thoughts on that here: http://tropophilia.com/2008/03/12/watch-what-you-put-online-even-if-youre-a-prostitute/.
Reply to this comment
by rugreen March 15, 2008 2:25 PM
She is a *****. She should be arrested and put on trial like the Mayflower Madam Sydney Biddle Barrows and Heidi Fleiss. She is not some young innocent. She was paid to have sex with the Governor and anyone else who paid for her sexual acts. Please, she is not the victim.
Reply to this comment
by ashleydupre March 19, 2008 11:37 AM
GirlsGoneWild founder Joe Francis has announced the adult version of the party video seen on NYPost and other blogs will be released later on today and can be found on affiliate site http://www.ashleydupregonewild.com . (warning mature content) Exclusive photos and additional "adult" videos of Ashley that cannot be found elsewhere on the web and are property of GirlsGoneWild will be available for direct download.
Reply to this comment
by Ask_A_Hooker March 19, 2008 12:23 PM
Want the REAL scoop on ****** like her? http://askahooker.blogspot.com/
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software