April 9, 2008 11:30 AM PDT

Flickr purists gripe about video expansion

Members of the No Video on Flickr group have posted hundreds of images protesting the photo-sharing site's inclusion of video.

Members of the No Video on Flickr group have posted hundreds of images protesting the photo-sharing site's inclusion of video.

(Credit: Flickr)

Shortly after Flickr added videos to its photo-sharing site, a number of users are up in arms.

The No Video on Flickr group amassed more than 4,000 members just a few hours after the new feature launched.

"I love Flickr, and I think it should stay the same way it has always been," the group description said. "We don't need another YouTube! I have nothing against YouTube, I just don't want to see all the $*#% that's on there to wind up on here!"

Personally, I find the concerns overblown, though it might have been judicious of Flickr to add an opt-out option for those who don't want video. A lot of people react unfavorably to change--think film buffs who don't care for digital cameras, for one example.

And I suspect video is likely to dilute the great photography that's available on Flickr much less than the vast oceans of mediocre snapshots on the site. The days of Flickr being a haven solely for refined, high-grade photography are long gone if indeed they ever existed. Also, who knows? Maybe the addition of video will help improve Flickr's business so it can be overhauled with a better user interface.

Flickr member Haeretik posted a petition, so far signed by hundreds of members, that states, "We all joined Flickr because of its dedication to photography and photographers, and we want Flickr to remain true to this dedication. It is our request that this feature and addition to Flickr be removed."

Some discussion on the gripe group has been constructive. For those who don't want videos to play, there is a Flickr configuration setting that lets users reverse the default behavior that the video will play automatically when its page is opened, and Firefox users can add extensions that block Flash videos.

(Via Thomas Hawk)

Originally posted at Underexposed
Recent posts from Webware
Earn your bandwidth black belt
Design new clothes in Flash with the hoodie-o-matic
More tidbits on the new Comcast cap (updated)
Napster won't rule out a sale
With 'followers,' Blogger gets--surprise!--more social
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 5 comments
by TroyJMorris April 9, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
Why add video, though? There are already sites out there that handle video, and usually, the key to happiness is simplicity. You can't be all things to all people.
Reply to this comment
by snugsoho April 9, 2008 1:42 PM PDT
Well, I for one am pleased Flickr now supports video, it's quite a handy feature to be able to upload short clips taken from your digital camera while out and about shooting photographs, I personally beleive it adds a degree of depth.

However it needs to be tightly monitored and all content kept relevent i.e. there shouldn't be any movie trailers etc uploaded, the last thing I want is for Flickr to turn into the confusing mess YouTube is these days with people uploading anything and everything.

It's a fine line to walk but I'm sure the staff at Flickr have thought this though enough and have made provisions to keep any video content on the site relevent.
Reply to this comment
by kevinm6 April 10, 2008 3:31 AM PDT
I just want to punch those cry babies in the face. They don't get why Yahoo is doing this. This is not a video service like Youtube or Yahoo Video. Adding video would be great when you want to explain why you took the photo and what was your inspiration. You don't need any more than 90sec to do that.
Reply to this comment View reply
by PP Martin April 12, 2008 5:27 AM PDT
I had been waiting for a long time for video to be added to Flickr to have a "one stop shopping" where both pictures and short videos can be exchanged with friends and family (and sometimes with others), enjoying all the power of the Flickr service (albums, sets, tags, geotags, customized sharing etc.). This service matches perfectly today's digital cameras which can take short movies from time to time to add another dimension to a series of pictures. I think that Flickr went out of its way to find precisely the right compromise (no clips over 90s) that smoothly integrates the "moving pictures" to the "not moving pictures". To conclude: the wait was worth it. Bravo Flickr!
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right