• On MovieTome: See the TRAILER for TERMINATOR 4!
June 6, 2008 10:45 AM PDT

A proposal for Twitter: Shut it down

Posted by Rafe Needleman
  • Print

As I write this, Amazon.com, like Twitter, is offline. Amazon's outage is the big news Friday morning. But what of Twitter?

I used to love Twitter. But the site's pogo status--it's up! it's down! it's up again!--is driving me away. I've removed the Twitter sidebar from the Webware home page, and I've stopped religiously updating it. Because I figure its users, and my followers, are learning to not trust it, to not bother visiting the site since it's likely to be down when they visit. Chances are fewer people are reading my Twitter posts now than a month ago.

I believe Twitter is bleeding users. Every time Twitter users go to Twitter.com or to their Twitter app and they see the "Fail Whale," an error message, or just a non-responsive site, they're that much less likely to come back the next time. Instead, they're going to FriendFeed, Jaiku, Pownce, or even the whacked-out Plurk.

Until the Twitter team can get the service working again for good, here's what they should strongly consider: Close the site. Take it offline. Put plywood over the doors and windows, as it were, with a big "We're remodeling!" sign on the front. Ask users if they want to be e-mailed when the site reopens for business and don't send that e-mail until the thing is fixed. Really fixed. Then have a grand reopening party.

It's not like doing this would cost Twitter revenue. It doesn't have any. But if Twitter is going to be online, it needs to be reliable. Twitter is not just a toy. It's a communications platform that people were just beginning to rely on before it overloaded and got flakey. Now, no one can rely on it and we're learning that at any given moment, there's a very good chance that Twitter will be offline. The more people who learn that, the fewer people will visit, and the more people will walk across the street to competing services. Remember how Friendster lost its momentum?

If Twitter can't deliver a reliable experience, I think its best bet is to close until it can. That way, we can all come back to the site at the same time, all together, instead of each of us showing up one by one and finding it deserted.

Related: Disqus' Downtime Reminds Us of Woes for Data In the Cloud, by Louis Gray.

Rafe Needleman writes about start-ups, new technologies, and Web 2.0 products, as editor of CNET's Webware. E-mail Rafe.
Recent posts from Webware
Music and browsing take flight in Songbird
BlackBerry's mobile Web site gets a refresh
Zagat on iPhone: 'A disappointment' die-hards will still 'love'
Facebook Marketplace relaunch powered by Oodle
Gmail comes to the desktop in gadget form
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 24 comments
by aintnolai June 6, 2008 11:13 AM PDT
couldn't disagree more. yes, the up and down nature of twitter is not the best, but the community on twitter is just too critical-mass for people to give up. they'll put up with it alot longer than you can imagine.

Back in the late 90's ICQ had the same reliability problem, and IM is much more time critical than twitter. But they survived. Twitter is has better uptime than ICQ at the time and its model tolerates more downtime.

now if scoble, calacanis and others start moving en masse to somewhere else, maybe that'll change. until then, don't count on it.

and to shutter a web site until they get it right? please, that's your frustration talking.
Reply to this comment
by britneymason June 6, 2008 11:18 AM PDT
Rafe: Im with you. Hey so they shut down for a few days, maybe a week. They come back up they have it under control. I think we can all survive a few days without twitter, heck we do already. With a good online community manager and PR they can spin the whole thing to be all about us the users and our experience.
Reply to this comment
by sfpeter June 6, 2008 11:56 AM PDT
I disagree. Twitter availability problems might drive away some users, but taking twitter down for extended time to fix the problems is guaranteed to drive away many more Twitter junkies. They'll be flocking to competitors and if they're set up over there with their new social network and they're happy, they will see no reason to come back to Twitter when it reopens its doors.
Reply to this comment
by Ethan_Baker June 6, 2008 12:43 PM PDT
3:42 - TWIITER DOWN!!! (again)
Reply to this comment
by seamus.condron June 6, 2008 1:26 PM PDT
Twitter better shape up,or else. http://www.seamus2oh.com/2008/06/twitter-goes-do.html
Reply to this comment
by sc456a June 6, 2008 1:29 PM PDT
I disagree with you Rafe. Simply put, if they take Twitter down because of the high load issues, how are they supposed to test their fixes? If they "close up shop", no one will be using it - thus the load disappears making testing impossible. They do need to get their act together, but shutting down to troubleshoot this sort of problem won't help them resolve it faster.
Reply to this comment
by JayMonster June 6, 2008 1:51 PM PDT
Like I said on the Cnet version of this... this makes as much sense as "Nobody goes to that restaurant any more because it is too crowded"

If "everybody" is leaving... the scaling problems would fix themselves... now wouldn't they?
Reply to this comment
by digiSal June 6, 2008 2:32 PM PDT
see you on jaiku http://digisal.jaiku.com hit me for an invite if you need one digisal at gmail dot com
Reply to this comment
by The Harper June 6, 2008 2:40 PM PDT
To sc456a: I am hoping that Twitter has a way to do Perf/scalability/load testing prior to pushing changes & enhancements to production! That is what QA, Integration, and Performance environments are for. Users shouldn't be the first ones to test the robustness and stability of a non-Beta feature or site, -ever-. If Twitter was not designed to handle the current traffic loads, their fix(es) to that problem should be vetted out in a non-Prod environment first. Of course, unless Twitter is one of these stereotypical, "We don't need to stinkin' QA team! Our Devs can poke around with stuff and make sure it works!" shops, in which case they deserve what's comin' to 'em!
Reply to this comment
by svk1069 June 6, 2008 2:43 PM PDT
If Google could get Jaiku relaunched soon, I think there would be a steady exodus of people from Twitter to Jaiku. I know they are moving Jaiku to the Google App Engine, so maybe that's the hold-up. I don't understand why they still are keeping locked up.

I love Plurk, but a lot of people either love it or hate it. It would be harder to convince my friends to go there.

Pownce is struggling with reliability issues of their own. They may not go down, but their site can be damn slow at times.
Reply to this comment
by someguy999 June 6, 2008 2:43 PM PDT
I like the restaurant analogy, but they've got it wrong. Its not becuase its too crowded, its becuase they've closed the door and refuse to let anyone in.

I call bs on ICQ, I used back in the 90s and it worked.

At the end of the day while people may have the worlds best business plan, if you can't keep your service up... you really should be asking yourself if you should be running the technical aspects of the service or whether users would be better served with your business plan on somebody elses servers/infrastructure...
Reply to this comment
by utilitycart June 6, 2008 3:29 PM PDT
"Chances are fewer people are reading my Twitter posts..."
Wah, wah, wah.
What a cry-baby.
Reply to this comment
by chaser7016 June 6, 2008 6:12 PM PDT
It's not Twitter if you don't see the whale a few times a day. Im used to it and just come back where it's working for me to tweet whats on my mind! It's so much cheaper then therapy!
Reply to this comment
by vchhahira June 6, 2008 6:40 PM PDT
from Plurk just now..."Plurk is getting new shoes (???). Plurk is currently under routine maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience. The upgrade should be complete by 10pm EDT, Friday, June 6. "
Reply to this comment
by timothysykes June 6, 2008 8:54 PM PDT
boo hoo, quit your whining, this is no different than AOL being busy back when they first started. supply demand baby, deal with it, u know it's only gonna get better

Tim
http://www.timothysykes.com
Reply to this comment
by kmbourke June 7, 2008 3:46 AM PDT
Totally agree, Rafe. I've been using it less and less, simply because it's either down, not streaming my feeds (I've missed so many tweets directed to me simply because they never showed up in my feed), or because its down -- constantly. What started as an important tool for me, is crumbling before my eyes. Fact is, there are many other places online to meet and communicate with my network.

It was fun while it lasted...
Reply to this comment
by ferretboy88 June 7, 2008 4:09 AM PDT
You have followers? I still can't get past that.
Reply to this comment
by thatchman1 June 7, 2008 6:37 AM PDT
Would you recommend the same thing to an Airline? Walmart? Gas stations with buggy authorization systems? I've been the loudest frustrated Twittter user I know, however, I don't agree with shutting it down. Think of this from an internal business perspective-- could we afford to shut down our bar coding system or the accounting system if it wacks out? Maybe.

I do think they should stop accepting new sign ups, however, and I've been happier with their uptime choice of limiting API usage and viewing past tweets.

They need a management change or to be bought out by a big name with distributed database experience-- not shut down.
Reply to this comment
by UberRob June 7, 2008 2:34 PM PDT
Rafe -

Sorry dude, this is not a realistic option - especially after taking in $15M-$20M to date....but even if they didn't, its not a realistic option. The unconfirmed twitter user base maybe under 3M, but it is a very important 3M - the twitterati are the digerati, and the system is used for everything from whining about daily life, to tech and business tips and info. The service is too valuable to close and too ripe for monetization (even if the folks at Twitter can't figure it out - some of us can...and it doesn't involve slapping ads up or charging for access).

The baby-with-the-bathwater approach is overly dramatic - Twitter needs an overhaul, absolutely, and they NEED to get off of Ruby. (Oh, calm down Ruby-people, I work with this thing every day, I'm very aware of what it can and cannot do - and it cannot do scale.) Twitter works as proof of concept, and it now has main-media name recognition. Get a tech team in there that can deal, get an exec team in there that can stop pointing fingers, put Twitter back on the road and lets move on. It's not going anywhere...
Reply to this comment
by awilensky June 7, 2008 5:41 PM PDT
I still cant see why some potential competitor hasn't cloned the service; there is no IP, no patents.

It also seems that the downtime is semi intentional http://bizcast.typepad.com/clients/2008/05/twitter-downtim.html
Reply to this comment
 See all 24 Comments >>
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

In the news now

A tech veteran responds to the recession

LogLogic's Patricia Sueltz heard a clear message about the economy from investors, but she already knows a thing or two about navigating through tough times.


Obama's AG pick on privacy

Eric Holder has criticized the warrantless wiretapping program, but his views on other online policies may not be that far from those of the Bush administration.


advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Business Tech

    IPOs a thing of the past?

    At AlwaysOn Venture Summit West conference, investment bankers, venture capitalists, and private equity players weigh in on the prognosis for the IPO market.

  • Gallery

    Photos: Space station marks a decade aloft

    The first pieces of the International Space Station went into orbit 10 years ago. Now a full-fledged lab facility, it continues to grow.

  • Security

    Apple deletes Mac antivirus suggestion

    Apple removes statement to customers urging them to use antivirus software, saying that Macs are safe "out of the box."

  • Beyond Binary

    Microsoft expands Vista SP2 testing

    Starting on Thursday, the software maker will make public a test version of the service pack update to Vista.

  • Video

    A toast to online wine A toast to online wine
  • Digital Media

    EFF, Bush administration spar over telecom immunity

    Feds tell district judge government must be allowed to protect the heartland. EFF says that is fine, but don't strip away constitutional rights.

  • Video

    Wi-Fi while you fly Wi-Fi while you fly
  • Gaming and Culture

    From Cy Young to video game fame

    Tim Lincecum, one of the best pitchers in baseball, was chosen to be the cover athlete for 2K Sports' next baseball game. On Tuesday, he did a motion-capture session for the game.

  • Green Tech

    Ta ta, Tesla

    Are the Valley-based VCs and big-wigs who back Tesla Motors really serious about asking the federal government for low-interest loans?

  • Gallery

    Photos: Top-rated reviews of the week

    Here are a few of CNET Reviews' favorite items from the past week, including Adobe suites, laptop bags, and a Panasonic flat panel TV.

  • The Download Blog

    Music and browsing take flight in Songbird

    Music and browsing mashup Songbird has kicked the remnants of its shell to the curb, and the program's main emphasis as a music browser couldn't be more clear.

  • Green Tech

    Ford accelerates electric-vehicle plans

    In its turnaround plan presented to Congress, Ford says it will invest billions in fuel efficiency and introduce a family of hybrid-electric and all-electric cars.