- Average user rating: 3.5 stars out of 16 reviews
- See all user reviews
Product summary
Overclocking might give it fits, but at stock speeds, AMD's new dual-core elite chip is as fast as we had imagined.
Specifications: Product Type: Processor; Processor Type: AMD Athlon 64 FX FX-60 See full specs
CNET editors' take
- Reviewed on: 01/09/2006
- Released on: 01/18/2005
Hot on the heels of Intel's second-generation dual-core Extreme Edition 955 chip comes AMD's Athlon 64 FX-60. More than just a speed bump to AMD's ultra-high-end FX line, the Athlon 64 FX-60 features two processing cores, bringing the FX series into the modern multicore era. Expect to see the chip available for $1,031.
Upside: Now that AMD's highest-end processor is dual core, we can paint a more straightforward desktop CPU picture. It was previously hard to explain that the Athlon 64 FX-57 was only a single-core CPU yet cost $200 more than AMD's top-of-the-line dual-core Athlon 64 X2 4800+. Now gamers and enthusiasts that invest in an ultra-high-end FX-60 chip can take advantage of all the forthcoming games and applications due to incorporate multicore optimizations. But the FX-60 is not merely an insurance policy for the future; our early tests show the FX-60 is lightning-fast on today's apps, as well.
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
 |
BAPCo SysMark 2004 rating | |
BAPCo SysMark 2004 Internet-content-creation rating | |
BAPCo SysMark 2004 office-productivity rating |
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
|
Half-Life 2 1,024x768, no AA no AF |
On our current suite of single-core and multithreaded benchmarks, the Athlon 64 FX-60 beats all other desktop chips on almost every test, including Intel's new Pentium Processor Extreme Edition 955 introduced at the end of December (the lone exception is a statistical tie with the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ on Half-Life 2). Of particular note are our DivX 6.1 tests. The recent update to that application saw the introduction of multithreaded code. While Intel's Extreme Edition 955 chip did well on the straight video encoding, it couldn't compete with the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ on multitasking. The Athlon 64 FX-60 not only beat Intel's chip by a larger margin on the multitasking, it also trumped the Extreme Edition 955 on the encode portion. We're curious to see how both of the new chips will perform on upcoming multithreaded games designed to take advantage of dual-core CPUs processing threads, but the early results favor AMD as strongly now as they did a few months back in our dual-core CPU prizefight.
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
|
Sorenson Squeeze 4 | |
Apple iTunes 4.7.1.30 | |
Adobe Photoshop CS |
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
|
Multitasking--McAfee VirusScan and DivX 6.1 encoding | |
DivX 6.1 encoding |
- See more CNET content tagged:
- AMD Athlon 64,
- AMD Athlon,
- AMD Athlon 64 X2,
- AMD,
- BAPCo
User reviews
- Average user rating: 3.5 stars out of 16 reviews
- My rating: 0 stars Write review
-
Showing 3 of 16 user reviewsSee all 16 user reviews
-
21 out of 21 people found this review helpful
-
6 out of 7 people found this review helpful
-
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful
- See all 16 user reviews Write review
